2008
DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.23.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population of Humic Acid Degrading Microorganisms in Andosols under Different Vegetation Types and Grassland Management Regimens

Abstract: To examine the effect of vegetation type and grassland management regimen on the distribution of humus-degrading microorganisms, populations of humic acid-degrading (HAD) bacteria and fungi at three Andosol sites were investigated using the dilution plate method. Each site had three different vegetation types (Eulalia grassland, bamboo grassland, and coniferous plantations). Among the six grassland sites, two were maintained by burning and the others by cutting. HAD microorganisms were found in all soil sample… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CFU of S. maltophilia (strain 3) was the highest in combination treatments, accounting for 86.92, 83.23 and 82.52 % of total CFU in T1+T3, T2+T3 and T1+T2+T3, respectively. Different bacterial species exhibited varying capacities for HA degradation (Yanagi et al, 2008), which are closely associated with their adaptability to HA. In the present study, S. maltophilia (strain 3) remained higher CFU in HA substrate among the various single-colony and combination treatments and became the dominant species, indicating its suitability in the medium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CFU of S. maltophilia (strain 3) was the highest in combination treatments, accounting for 86.92, 83.23 and 82.52 % of total CFU in T1+T3, T2+T3 and T1+T2+T3, respectively. Different bacterial species exhibited varying capacities for HA degradation (Yanagi et al, 2008), which are closely associated with their adaptability to HA. In the present study, S. maltophilia (strain 3) remained higher CFU in HA substrate among the various single-colony and combination treatments and became the dominant species, indicating its suitability in the medium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the soil environment and global change are profoundly impacted by soil organic carbon (SOC); mainly consisting of humus C. Humic acids (HA) are a component of soil humus with an intermediate molecular weight, a complex structure and relatively active chemical and biological properties. The functional group structure and elemental composition of HA vary with different vegetation types, land-use patterns and extraction methods (Tatzber et al, 2007;Yanagi et al, 2008;Prentice, Webb, 2010). It has been found that traditional cultivation patterns are unfavourable for SOC sequestration and transformation (Eaton, Lawrence, 2009;Acharya et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large variety of bacterial consortia capable of degrading HSs were isolated from soil [ 9 , 13 , 14 , 93 , 94 ], coal [ 20 ], or aquatic environments [ 2 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 ], including marine and estuarine waters [ 6 , 99 , 100 ]. According to the data presented by Yanagi and coauthors [ 14 ], the population of total bacteria that were capable of degrading soil HAs varied from 0.1 × 10 6 to 2.8 × 10 6 CFU g −1 of soil, forming 0.2–3.5% of the total microbe density.…”
Section: Utilization Degradation and Transformation Of Hss By Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungi, which are active in the decomposition process, mainly include ascomycetes and basidiomycetes ( Table 3 ), which are common in the upper layer of forest and grassland soils [ 10 ]. Estimates performed by Yanagi and coworkers showed that the density of HA-degrading fungi in soil ranged from 1.9 × 10 4 to 14.9 × 10 4 CFU g −1 soil, or 2.4–12.5% of total fungi density [ 14 ].…”
Section: Utilization Degradation and Transformation Of Hss By Fungi In Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation