1998
DOI: 10.1143/jpsj.67.1594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Inversion between Uncoupled Atomic States through Cavity Modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We see that at most two photons can be generated with a significant probability and the third level becomes partially populated (if g 2 = 0, then the results coincide with that obtained in [18]). A similar effect of an indirect interaction between different energy levels was discovered in [28], where the coupling constants depended on the timedependent cavity length L(t) as g ∼ [L(t)] −1/2 , while the cavity frequency was supposed to be constant. One more analog is the effect of "atomic shaking" in cavities with moving boundaries, studied in [29].…”
Section: B Resonances With Creation Of Two Photonssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…We see that at most two photons can be generated with a significant probability and the third level becomes partially populated (if g 2 = 0, then the results coincide with that obtained in [18]). A similar effect of an indirect interaction between different energy levels was discovered in [28], where the coupling constants depended on the timedependent cavity length L(t) as g ∼ [L(t)] −1/2 , while the cavity frequency was supposed to be constant. One more analog is the effect of "atomic shaking" in cavities with moving boundaries, studied in [29].…”
Section: B Resonances With Creation Of Two Photonssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…For example, the authors of [8,9] took into account only the time variations of the cavity eigenfrequency ω(t) ∼ [L(t)] −1 , assuming that g and do not depend on time. Transitions between two optically uncoupled atomic states of a three-level atom in a cavity with variable length were considered in [10]. The only time-dependent coefficient was g(t) ∼ [L(t)] −1/2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as δ2 ≪ ν, the maximal value of the increment coefficient Re(λ ± ) is practically the same as in the case of strict resonance (17). Energies of both modes have the same order of magnitude (as in the strict resonance case), therefore this regime of excitation can be named "symmetrical".…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In particular, the interaction between the excited field mode and the detector, approximated either by a harmonic oscillator or by a two-level atom, was considered in [7,8,[15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%