2008
DOI: 10.1537/ase.070309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population history of the northern and central Nansei Islands (Ryukyu island arc) based on dental morphological variations: gene flow from North Kyushu to Nansei Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference is qualitatively comparable to the facial shift from the Jomon to the modern Japanese in Honshu, and may result from a southward population influx from the main islands of the Japanese archipelago during medieval times (e.g. Asato, 1996;Doi, 2003;Higa et al, 2003;Manabe et al, 2008Manabe et al, , 2011. Nevertheless, the results indicate that the early-modern Okinawans had facial features seen in both Okinawa Jomon/ Yayoi and early-modern Honshu Japanese, as plausibly illustrated by the PCA result ( Figure 6A).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This difference is qualitatively comparable to the facial shift from the Jomon to the modern Japanese in Honshu, and may result from a southward population influx from the main islands of the Japanese archipelago during medieval times (e.g. Asato, 1996;Doi, 2003;Higa et al, 2003;Manabe et al, 2008Manabe et al, , 2011. Nevertheless, the results indicate that the early-modern Okinawans had facial features seen in both Okinawa Jomon/ Yayoi and early-modern Honshu Japanese, as plausibly illustrated by the PCA result ( Figure 6A).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…However, both morphological and genetic findings have also emphasized differential traits of the Ryukyuans (including the Okinawans) from the Jomon/Ainu cluster, cautioning against a simple model that regards the modern Ryukyuans as direct descendants of the prehistoric Jomon, and suggesting considerable population influx from surrounding regions into the Ryukyu area during medieval times (Dodo et al, 1998(Dodo et al, , 2000Asato and Doi, 1999;Hatta et al, 1999;Pietrusewsky, 1999Pietrusewsky, , 2004Pietrusewsky, , 2010Higa et al, 2003;Fukumine et al, 2006;Manabe et al, 2008Manabe et al, , 2011. Dodo et al (2000) compared facial skeletons among many Japanese groups from different periods and regions, and found that the early-modern Okinawans did not exhibit some facial characteristics that are manifested in both Jomon and Ainu (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population history of the Japanese has not been entirely clarified, but the bulk of the evidence suggests admixture between the Jomon people and the immigrant population lineages of the Yayoi period (c. 2350-1650 BP) thought to have come from the Asian continent. A dominant genetic influence of the latter is generally supposed (Hanihara, 1987(Hanihara, , 1991(Hanihara, , 1993Dodo and Ishida, 1990;Nakahashi, 1993;Omoto and Saitou, 1997), but the timing, extent, and nature of admixture appears to be regionally and temporally complex and remains the subject of active study (Ossenberg et al, 2006;Matsumura, 2007;Manabe et al, 2008;Nakahashi and Iizuka, 2008;Hanihara and Ishida, 2009;Ishida et al, 2009;Kawakubo et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many dental anthropologists see the Ainu (and the Jomon) as Southeast Asian sundadonts (Turner, 1987(Turner, , 1990(Turner, , 1992aHanihara, 1991;Matsumura, 1995Matsumura, , 2007Matsumura and Hudson, 2005;Manabe et al, 2008;Matsumura et al, 2009). It is often pointed out, moreover, that extensive dental size reduction occurs exclusively in Ainu and their Jomon predecessors, together with the Philippine Negritos in eastern Asia (Brace et al, 1989(Brace et al, , 1991Brace and Hunt, 1990;Hanihara and Ishida, 2005;Matsumura and Hudson, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, similar assessments have not been elucidated from a classic dental anthropological approach (Manabe et al, 2008;Matsumura et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%