2020
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esaa001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Genomics Training for the Next Generation of Conservation Geneticists: ConGen 2018 Workshop

Abstract: The increasing availability and complexity of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data sets make ongoing training an essential component of conservation and population genetics research. A workshop entitled “ConGen 2018” was recently held to train researchers in conceptual and practical aspects of NGS data production and analysis for conservation and ecological applications. Sixteen instructors provided helpful lectures, discussions, and hands-on exercises regarding how to plan, produce, and analyze data for many… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, raw sequencing reads of each library were filtered for PCR duplicates using clone_filter. Then reads were de-multiplexed by individual barcode and re-oriented using the --bestrad flag in process_radtags, allowing for 3 mismatches and discarding reads with low-quality scores (Catchen, Hohenlohe, Bassham, Amores, & Cresko, 2013; Rochette et al, 2019; Stahlke et al, 2020). Each processed sample was then aligned to our D. carinulata draft genome using the --very_sensitive flag of bowtie2 version 2.2.9 (Langmead & Salzberg, 2012), and sorted with SAMtools version 1.9 (Li et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, raw sequencing reads of each library were filtered for PCR duplicates using clone_filter. Then reads were de-multiplexed by individual barcode and re-oriented using the --bestrad flag in process_radtags, allowing for 3 mismatches and discarding reads with low-quality scores (Catchen, Hohenlohe, Bassham, Amores, & Cresko, 2013; Rochette et al, 2019; Stahlke et al, 2020). Each processed sample was then aligned to our D. carinulata draft genome using the --very_sensitive flag of bowtie2 version 2.2.9 (Langmead & Salzberg, 2012), and sorted with SAMtools version 1.9 (Li et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, raw sequencing reads of each library were filtered for PCR duplicates using clone_filter. Then, reads were demultiplexed by individual barcode and re-oriented using the --bestrad flag in pro-cess_radtags, allowing for 3 mismatches and discarding reads with low-quality scores (Catchen et al, 2013;Rochette et al, 2019;Stahlke et al, 2020). Each processed sample was then aligned to our D. carinulata draft genome using the --very_sensitive flag of bowtie2 version 2.2.9 (Langmead & Salzberg, 2012), and sorted with SAMtools version 1.9 (Li et al, 2009).…”
Section: Sampling and Individual Genotyping Across The Native Range I...mentioning
confidence: 99%