2015
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Genomics for Understanding Adaptation in Wild Plant Species

Abstract: Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection is the foundation of modern biology. However, it has proven remarkably difficult to demonstrate at the genetic, genomic, and population level exactly how wild species adapt to their natural environments. We discuss how one can use large sets of multiple genome sequences from wild populations to understand adaptation, with an emphasis on the small herbaceous plant Arabidopsis thaliana. We present motivation for such studies; summarize progress in describing whol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
89
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 164 publications
1
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are another approach to decipher the genetic architecture of traits (Weigel and Nordborg, 2015). Recently, two flowering-time GWAS in B. distachyon identified nine and five associated peaks, none of which overlap with the QTLs identified in this study (Tyler et al, 2016;Wilson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are another approach to decipher the genetic architecture of traits (Weigel and Nordborg, 2015). Recently, two flowering-time GWAS in B. distachyon identified nine and five associated peaks, none of which overlap with the QTLs identified in this study (Tyler et al, 2016;Wilson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Recently, two flowering-time GWAS in B. distachyon identified nine and five associated peaks, none of which overlap with the QTLs identified in this study (Tyler et al, 2016;Wilson et al, 2015). Thus, the QTL identified in our RIL population may represent rare alleles that do not surface in GWAS, or the GWAS that was conducted contains too few accessions or compounding population structures (issues that are common when conducting GWAS in in-breeding species; Weigel and Nordborg 2015). For example, initial GWAS flowering studies in Arabidopsis had difficulty identifying FLOWERING LOCUS C and FRIGIDA, two genes responsible for much of the flowering-time variation among accessions of Arabidopsis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GWA screens can complement QTL studies by identification of loci that do not have segregating alleles in the two RIL founder populations (Gibson 2012; Weigel and Nordborg 2015). We used 64 of the 98 accessions we had screened previously for a GWA study (see Table S3) because whole-genome resequencing data were available for them (http://1001genomes.org; 1001 Genomes Consortium 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, the lower the selective pressure, the greater the accumulation of mutations, and mutated allelic sites in genic regions are usually easily swept away under the relatively greater selective pressure in these regions. Finally, some variable regions result from adaptative pressures, whereby mutations in genes related to adaptive capacity are more likely to be retained, as variability may increase survival probabilities with exposure to environmental stress (Hayward et al, 2015; Weigel and Nordborg, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%