2013
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Genomic Analysis Reveals No Evidence for GC-Biased Gene Conversion in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: Gene conversion is the nonreciprocal exchange of genetic material between homologous chromosomes. Multiple lines of evidence from a variety of taxa strongly suggest that gene conversion events are biased toward GC-bearing alleles. However, in Drosophila, the data have largely been indirect and unclear, with some studies supporting the predictions of a GC-biased gene conversion model and other data showing contradictory findings. Here, we test whether gene conversion events are GC-biased in Drosophila melanogas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2010), and are thought to be closer to base composition equilibrium than other genomic regions (Kern and Begun 2005; Haddrill and Charlesworth 2008; Singh et al. 2009; Robinson et al. 2014), a pattern we have also observed (fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2010), and are thought to be closer to base composition equilibrium than other genomic regions (Kern and Begun 2005; Haddrill and Charlesworth 2008; Singh et al. 2009; Robinson et al. 2014), a pattern we have also observed (fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2012; Campos et al. 2013; Robinson et al. 2014), although there is some evidence either for the action of selection for GC basepairs or gBGC on the evolution of non-coding sequences in D. simulans (Haddrill and Charlesworth 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies have supported significant gcBGC effects in Drosophila (Marais et al 2001; Singh et al 2005b; Haddrill and Charlesworth 2008) recent studies based on whole genome level recombination rates and polymorphisms from D. melanogaster have suggested otherwise (Comeron et al 2012; Robinson et al 2014). Robinson et al (2014) has suggested the different amount of gcBGC between the X chromosome and autosomes could be due to a shift in the mutational processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies have supported significant gcBGC effects in Drosophila (Marais et al 2001; Singh et al 2005b; Haddrill and Charlesworth 2008) recent studies based on whole genome level recombination rates and polymorphisms from D. melanogaster have suggested otherwise (Comeron et al 2012; Robinson et al 2014). Robinson et al (2014) has suggested the different amount of gcBGC between the X chromosome and autosomes could be due to a shift in the mutational processes. Here, analysis of short introns from the X chromosome and autosomes of D. ananassae , which were previously shown to be close to neutrality in Drosophila (Haddrill et al 2005; Halligan and Keightley 2006; Singh et al 2009; Robinson et al 2014), would indicate any potential difference in the mutational process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation