2007
DOI: 10.1134/s1022795407080170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population-genetic study of Balkan endemic nephropathy in Serbia

Abstract: The study of Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN) in the affected localities of southern Serbia shows population-genetic difference between samples of BEN affected individuals and control group consisting of non-affected individuals from the same localities. Detailed population-genetic study in village Chepure, which includes 20 large families where BEN is present in 646 (from first to fourth degree) relatives of probands, shows a familial character of disease as well as significant genetic influences in expressio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
7

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
12
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several possible explanations for the established differences in recessive homozygosity degree among different groups of affected individuals and the control [12,13,15,29,31]:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possible explanations for the established differences in recessive homozygosity degree among different groups of affected individuals and the control [12,13,15,29,31]:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genes which control the qualitative characteristics studied here are markers not only of different chromosomes but also of surrounding groups of polygenes which may have direct impact on the predisposition for DDH expression (CVJETICANIN and MARINKOVIC, 2005a; CVJETICANIN and MARINKOVIC, 2005b; MARINKOVIC and CVJETICANIN, 2013). The genes that determine expression of tested traits may influence to a certain degree the addaptive value of the organism, and thus provide certain advantages or disadvantage in specific enviromental conditions (CVJETICANIN and MARINKOVIC, 2005a;CVJETICANIN and MARINKOVIC, 2005b;CVJETICANIN and MARINKOVIC, 2009;MARINKOVIC and CVJETICANIN, 2007;MARINKOVIC et al, 2008;MARINKOVIC et al, 2013;NIKOLIC et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comparison between ill and healthy individuals, pupils from special and regular schools, carriers of different blood types etc.) (BLAGOJEVIC et al, 1989;CVJETICANIN and MARINKOVIC, 2005a;CVJETICANIN and MARINKOVIC, 2009;MARINKOVIC et al, 1990;MARINKOVIC et al, 1994;MARINKOVIC et al, 2007;MARINKOVIC et al, 2008;MARKOVIC-DENIC et al, 1992;NIKOLIC et al, 2010;PETRICEVIC and CVJETICANIN, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of homozigously-recessive characteristics (HRC) test, used to determine genetic homozygosity in humans over 30 years, has shown that the group of individuals with different conditions have higher genetic homozygosity and lower variability for tested genes compared to the healthy control groups [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%