2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population genetic differentiation in taxa of Lotus (Fabaceae: Loteae) endemic to the Gran Canarian pine forest

Abstract: A survey of allozyme variation at 17 loci in 14 populations representing four taxonomically problematic Gran Canarian pine forest endemic taxa of Lotus (L. genistoides, L. holosericeus, L. spartioides and some taxonomically uncertain populations collected under the designation Lotus sp.) was conducted to examine their diversification and systematic relationships. All groups exhibited high values of genetic variation, although inbreeding was common within populations. Considerable among-population genetic homog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This expectation is consistent with the result ( Table 1) that the sub-samplings in Lotus (where seeds disperse by gravity, thereby fostering reproduction in small genetic neighborhoods Oliva-Tejera et al 2005), give higher G ST over-estimates than in the two species of Crambe, putative predominant outcrossers with a homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility system (Kroh 1964, Zuberi andDickinson 1985) and a high seed dispersal capacity; accordingly, they exhibit low F IS values (as opposed to the much higher F IS values estimated in Lotus by Oliva-Tejera et al 2005), and only moderate genetic structure (Soto et al unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This expectation is consistent with the result ( Table 1) that the sub-samplings in Lotus (where seeds disperse by gravity, thereby fostering reproduction in small genetic neighborhoods Oliva-Tejera et al 2005), give higher G ST over-estimates than in the two species of Crambe, putative predominant outcrossers with a homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility system (Kroh 1964, Zuberi andDickinson 1985) and a high seed dispersal capacity; accordingly, they exhibit low F IS values (as opposed to the much higher F IS values estimated in Lotus by Oliva-Tejera et al 2005), and only moderate genetic structure (Soto et al unpublished data).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Comparisons between G ST and h estimates were obtained through the computer software FSTAT version 2.9.3.2 (Goudet 1995(Goudet , 2002 after generating all the needed files from the corresponding genotype matrices using Transformer-3 (Caujapé-Castells and Baccarani-Rosas 2005). Because G ST was estimated using GeneStat-PC 3.31 (Lewis and Whitkus 1993) in the papers where the data used are discussed (Oliva-Tejera et al 2005, 2006and Soto et al 2007a, a comparison between values of this parameter estimated by that software and FSTAT version 2.9.3.2 was also undertaken. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess the significance of the differences in the values of G ST and h.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these two Crambe spp., the average genetic identities between and within taxa are significantly different ( I NEI = 0.877 and I NEI = 0.929–0.923, respectively) and the average genetic identity between them is closely similar to the interspecific values found in other Canarian endemics, such as Parolinia (Brassicaceae) ( I NEI = 0.754–0.914; Fernández‐Palacios et al ., ), in Lotus L. (Fabaceae) from the Gran Canarian pine forest ( I NEI = 0.822–0.939; Oliva‐Tejera et al ., ) or in coastal Lotus spp. ( I NEI = 0.823–0.894; Oliva‐Tejera et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 10 species we were unable to add more than one sample to represent the species and we included more than one accession for 27 species. Our analysis also included accessions from some populations that (based on previous molecular and morphological analyses) may represent four new undescribed species within the section Pedrosia (Oliva-Tejera et al 2005, 2006; Sandral et al 2006; A. Santos-Guerra, Unidad de Botanica-ICIA, pers. comm.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%