2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05917.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population effects on the red giant clump absolute magnitude: theKband

Abstract: We present a detailed analysis of the behaviour of the red clump K-band absolute magnitude (M RC K ) in simple and composite stellar populations, in light of its use as a standard candle for distance determinations. The advantage of using M RC K , following recent empirical calibrations of its value for the solar neighbourhood, arises from its very low sensitivity to extinction by interstellar dust. We show that, as in the case of the V-and I-band results, M RC K is a complicated function of the stellar metall… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
214
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
26
214
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Zoccali et al (2008), the bulge's metal content varies from [Fe/H] ∼ −0.3 at b = −12 • to [Fe/H] ∼ −0.1 at b = −4 • and there is a hint of a lack of gradients in the inner regions ). Teramo stellar evolution models indicate that a 0.2 dex variation in metallicity would affect the intrinsic magnitude of the RC by ∼0.10 mag, consistent as well with Salaris & Girardi (2002). If for a solar metallicity population at 8 kpc from the Sun we assume a main metallicity 0.20 dex lower, our method will result in measuring a distance of ∼8.2 kpc instead.…”
Section: Bulge Luminosity Function and Distancessupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Zoccali et al (2008), the bulge's metal content varies from [Fe/H] ∼ −0.3 at b = −12 • to [Fe/H] ∼ −0.1 at b = −4 • and there is a hint of a lack of gradients in the inner regions ). Teramo stellar evolution models indicate that a 0.2 dex variation in metallicity would affect the intrinsic magnitude of the RC by ∼0.10 mag, consistent as well with Salaris & Girardi (2002). If for a solar metallicity population at 8 kpc from the Sun we assume a main metallicity 0.20 dex lower, our method will result in measuring a distance of ∼8.2 kpc instead.…”
Section: Bulge Luminosity Function and Distancessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…(2), in the regions As discussed for the reddening calculations, the assumption of homogeneous stellar populations on the bulge are the main source of uncertainties. The intrinsic magnitude of the RC is known to have a dependence on age and metallicity (Salaris & Girardi 2002;Pietrzyński et al 2003). While the age of the bulge is expected to be homogeneously old (∼10 Gyr), the metallicity is known to change at least along the minor axis (Zoccali et al 2008).…”
Section: Bulge Luminosity Function and Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dependence of He abundance and contamination from AGB stars Saviane et al (2012) highlighted that the CaT method works on the assumption that V HB depends almost exclusively on [Fe/H], the other stellar parameters playing only a secondary role. While this is true for the age of old stellar systems such as GGCs (Salaris & Girardi 2002;Ferraro et al 2006), cluster-to-cluster differences in helium abundance can instead be significant, and might cause higher residuals in the calibration, if these differences are not correlated with metallicity. In general, halo GGCs share a common He abundance (Buzzoni et al 1983;Zoccali et al 2000;Cassisi et al 2003), but this might be different for BGCs.…”
Section: Metallicitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the distance a correction for population effects has to be applied (Gullieuszik et al 2007), because of the differences in the stellar content of LMC red clump stars and the Galactic red clumps on which the Alves (2000) calibration is based. Salaris & Girardi (2002) estimated the population effects on the RC absolute magnitude in the K band of ΔM RC K = −0.03. The mean distance value is (m − M) 0 = 18.46 ± 0.07.…”
Section: Period-[fe/h] Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%