2018
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/139/1/012026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population dynamics of the yellowstripe scad (Selaroides leptolepis Cuvier, 1833) and Indian mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta Cuvier, 1816) in the Wondama Bay Water, Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data showed that the length of the fish ranges from 95 mm to 222 mm. The total length of S. leptolepis caught in Tomini Bay during this study was slightly different from the same species found in Wondama Bay with a range from 100 to 240 mm (Sala et al, 2018) and also the S. leptolepis size at the Bintan waters fishing areas ranging of 102-215 mm (Septiyawati et al, 2020). The size of the males and females caught were not much different (p-value > 0.05).…”
Section: Length Frequency Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The data showed that the length of the fish ranges from 95 mm to 222 mm. The total length of S. leptolepis caught in Tomini Bay during this study was slightly different from the same species found in Wondama Bay with a range from 100 to 240 mm (Sala et al, 2018) and also the S. leptolepis size at the Bintan waters fishing areas ranging of 102-215 mm (Septiyawati et al, 2020). The size of the males and females caught were not much different (p-value > 0.05).…”
Section: Length Frequency Distributioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The size structure of Selaroides leptolepis that has been caught was between 4.5-18.5 cm FL with the dominant mode at 11.5 cm FL (Figure 4). This size is still smaller than those caught in the waters of Tomini Bay between 9.5-22.2 cm TL, Wondaman Bay 10-24 cm TL, Ternate 8.2-21.7 cm TL and 5.65-31.82 cm TL and larger than in the Sunda Strait waters 9-18 cm TL and Matang Malaysia 9-17.5 cm TL [21,[29][30][31][32][33]. The difference in the size structure of the caught fish can be caused by differences in fishing gear and mesh sizes used in various waters [13].…”
Section: Size Structure and Resource Usementioning
confidence: 57%
“…Kajian potensi sumber daya ikan di wilayah perairan Papua Barat telah dilakukan pada konteks lokal terutama untuk sumber daya ikan yang wilayah jelajahnya relatif tidak luas, seperti ikan karang dan ikan-ikan pelagis kecil (Hisyam et al, 2020). Berbagai kajian yang dilakukan menggunakan metode data berbasis panjang (length-based method) yang direkomendasikan untuk perikanan yang miskin data (poor data) (Froese et al, 2019) dan hasilnya mengkonfirmasikan bahwa kondisi sumber daya perikanan karang sudah berada di atas level pemanfaatan yang optimal (Bawole et al, 2018;Bawole et al, 2017;Mudjirahayu et al, 2017) sedangkan untuk ikan pelagis kecil, misalnya ikan kembung masing pada level yang belum dimanfaatkan secara optimal (Sala et al, 2018).…”
Section: A Potensi Perikanan DI Papua Barat Dalam Mendukung Ketahanan...unclassified