2008
DOI: 10.1643/ce-06-271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Dynamics of the Concho Water Snake in Rivers and Reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the relatively recent discovery of both populations of N. harteri, their distribution, habitat preference, and ecology have been extensively reviewed in the literature (Tinkle and Conant 1961;Mecham 1983;Smith 1983;Scott et al 1989;Greene et al 1994;Whiting et al 1996;Whiting et al 1997;Whiting et al 1998;Greene et al 1999;Gibbons and Dorcas 2004;Whiting et al 2008;McBride 2009). Unlike two other sympatric congeners, the Diamondback water snake (N. rhombifer) and the Blotched water snake (N. erythrogaster transversa), N. harteri is smaller bodied and more prone to desiccation and has a higher affinity for aquatic habitats (Scott et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the relatively recent discovery of both populations of N. harteri, their distribution, habitat preference, and ecology have been extensively reviewed in the literature (Tinkle and Conant 1961;Mecham 1983;Smith 1983;Scott et al 1989;Greene et al 1994;Whiting et al 1996;Whiting et al 1997;Whiting et al 1998;Greene et al 1999;Gibbons and Dorcas 2004;Whiting et al 2008;McBride 2009). Unlike two other sympatric congeners, the Diamondback water snake (N. rhombifer) and the Blotched water snake (N. erythrogaster transversa), N. harteri is smaller bodied and more prone to desiccation and has a higher affinity for aquatic habitats (Scott et al 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are few reports of population growth rates in snakes (Webb et al 2002;Altwegg et al 2005) and fewer still for species native to North America (Whiting et al 2008). Studies investigating population ecology of a Viperid (Altwegg et al 2005) and a long-lived Elapid (average generation time of 10.4 years) (Webb et al 2002) also found k to be more sensitive to changes in adult survival rates, but this pattern did not hold for a shorter-lived Elapid (average generation time of 5.9 years) also studied (Webb et al 2002).…”
Section: Estimation Of and Factors Influencing Demographic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty in estimates of k may arise from uncertainty in adult and subadult survival estimates, which included death and permanent emigration but not immigration, potentially biasing the estimates low. In a review of studies reporting first year survival of early-maturing North American snakes, Whiting et al (2008) estimated average annual survival at 0.24. Drymarchon couperi is considered a late-maturing colubrid (Stevenson et al 2009); however, our estimates of first year survival of approximately 0.29 is similar to that estimated for early-maturing colubrids in their first year.…”
Section: Estimation Of and Factors Influencing Demographic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferences made using survey counts may lead to false conclusions about the status of the population if the relationship between counts and population sizes are not known. Wildlife monitoring programs use markrecapture studies or mark-resight surveys for estimates of population size, survival and recruitment, to learn about the population's response to management actions, and to validate population indices used for long-term population monitoring (e.g., Thompson et al 1998;Williams et al 2002;Skalski et al 2005;Whiting et al 2008). If there is a strong correlation between survey counts and population estimates, indices can be standardized to approximate population sizes (Nichols 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%