Population dynamics of oceanic manta rays (Mobula birostris) in the Raja Ampat Archipelago, West Papua, Indonesia, and the impacts of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation on their movement ecology

Abstract

Aim:Our aim was to collect sightings data on oceanic manta rays (Mobula birostris) within the Raja Ampat Archipelago to better understand their population dynamics within the region. These data were compared with environmental variables to seek correlates that may explain any variations in observed sightings frequency.Combined, it is hoped this knowledge will be used to aid effective management of this species in the region.Location: Raja Ampat Archipelago, West Papua, Indonesia. Methods:We collected and catalogued photo-identification of individuals to create a sightings database. To generate estimates of abundance, survival, sighting probability and recruitment to the population, we used a POPAN mark-recapture model. We considered time-varying and fixed values for each parameter and possible covariate relationships of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and sex. Results: A total of 588 individuals were identified over six years, of which 72.4% were female, and 28.2% of individuals were resighted. There was an exponential increase in sightings during the 2015-2016 ENSO event despite constant effort; significant correlation was found between sightings and the multivariate ENSO index and with sea surface temperatures but not with chlorophyll-a. Mark-recapture analysis shows a clear relationship between ENSO and entry probability, and the most parsimonious model estimated a superpopulation size N of 1875 individuals. Main conclusion: Oceanic manta ray distributions appear to be impacted by ENSOrelated climate phenomena. Our findings on the relationship of ENSO to manta sightings and distribution indicate that oceanic manta rays are likely sensitive to large-scale climatic variability. This illustrates the potential impacts of climate change on oceanic manta populations and the need to consider climate impacts in developing management strategies. Continued photo-ID, tagging and population genetics would greatly | 1473 BEALE Et AL.

The Distribution of Giant Manta Rays In The Western North Atlantic Ocean Off The Eastern United States

“…Although the species is globally distributed, individual manta ray populations are highly fragmented (CITES 2013). Giant manta rays appear to conduct seasonal migrations following prey abundance (Clark 2010;Burgess 2017;Beale et al 2019), with prey including planktonic and micronektonic organisms such as euphausiids, copepods, mysids, decapod larvae and shrimp, and sh spawn (Bertolini 1933;Bigelow and Schroeder 1953;Carpenter and Niem 2001;Rohner et al 2017a;Stewart et al 2017). Many international studies have documented seasonal sighting patterns associated with movements of prey, current circulation and tidal patterns, seasonal upwelling, seawater temperature, and possibly mating behavior (Couturier et al 2012;De Boer et al 2015;Armstrong et al 2016;Hacohen-Domené et al 2017).…”

Sublethal Injuries and Physical Abnormalities in Maldives Manta Rays, Mobula alfredi and Mobula birostris

“…Potentially, these results reflect the contrasting life history of the species, for example, the more wide-ranging nature of M. birostris compared to M. alfredi (Kashiwagi et al, 2011;Stewart et al, 2016b;Marshall et al, 2020). However, similar to M. alfredi, sex and life-stage segregation of habitat-use by M. birostris has been reported, for example, in southeast Florida (Pate and Marshall, 2020), Indonesia (Beale et al, 2019) and the Gulf of Mexico (Stewart et al, 2018a). Juvenile M. birostris were found to aggregate in shallow reef habitats, which serve as nursery grounds (Stewart et al, 2018a;Pate and Marshall, 2020), and a female bias was found at cleaning stations (Beale et al, 2019).…”

Manta Ray Tourism

“…There are a number of widely known manta ray sub-populations inlcuding in Raja Ampat, Komodo, and Nusa Penida based on studies conducted by Germanov and Marshall [26], Beale [27], and showed on Figure 4.…”