2013
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population dynamics can be more important than physiological limits for determining range shifts under climate change

Abstract: Evidence is accumulating that species' responses to climate changes are best predicted by modelling the interaction of physiological limits, biotic processes and the effects of dispersal-limitation. Using commercially harvested blacklip (Haliotis rubra) and greenlip abalone (Haliotis laevigata) as case studies, we determine the relative importance of accounting for interactions among physiology, metapopulation dynamics and exploitation in predictions of range (geographical occupancy) and abundance (spatially e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
74
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
4
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, our results may somewhat alleviate concerns over inaccurate forecasts due to changing niches [1,3]. Problems still remain, however, in that ENM and SDM methods typically do not account for dispersal limitations or altered biotic interactions [87] (though see [85]); nor do they consider that species can alter their behaviour or microhabitat preferences to buffer against environmental changes [2,88]. We show that large-scale parameters of species' niches, in this case temperature and salinity, do not change for a phylogenetically and ecologically diverse set of marine molluscs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In particular, our results may somewhat alleviate concerns over inaccurate forecasts due to changing niches [1,3]. Problems still remain, however, in that ENM and SDM methods typically do not account for dispersal limitations or altered biotic interactions [87] (though see [85]); nor do they consider that species can alter their behaviour or microhabitat preferences to buffer against environmental changes [2,88]. We show that large-scale parameters of species' niches, in this case temperature and salinity, do not change for a phylogenetically and ecologically diverse set of marine molluscs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…First, we used species occurrence data, but perhaps abundance data would have been better, especially if the values of the community thermal indices are heavily influenced by the presence of rare species. The latter may go extinct in response to climate change simply because they are already in sink habitats (Fordham et al, 2013). However, there was no indication that this was a problem in our study; the patterns we found in the community thermal indices along the thermal gradients were strong and significant.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…In other words, we can now focus on communities and populations rather than species [30,74]. While such an approach is likely not appropriate for all applications, it may be particularly relevant for examination of particular species of interest such as threatened and/or endangered species [75], commercially important species [76,77], disease-causing organisms [78], and keystone or structuring species that have cascading effects on ecosystems [79].…”
Section: Application To Climate Adaptation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%