2013
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201306091489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population dynamics and seed banks of the threatened seagrassHalophila beccariiin Pearl Bay, Guangxi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…data) and are dominated by Aegiceras corniculatum and Avicennia marina, with some Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and Kandelia obovata. Beds of the seagrass Zostera japonica are distributed seaward and extend from the edges of the mangrove forests on tidal flats, while Halophila beccarii is distributed in small patches on tidal flats, typically along tidal creeks (Qiu et al 2013(Qiu et al , 2014. All mangrovevegetated areas in Pearl Bay are included in the Beilun Estuary Mangrove Nature Reserve (Ma et al 2011, China Mangrove Conservation Network, www.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…data) and are dominated by Aegiceras corniculatum and Avicennia marina, with some Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and Kandelia obovata. Beds of the seagrass Zostera japonica are distributed seaward and extend from the edges of the mangrove forests on tidal flats, while Halophila beccarii is distributed in small patches on tidal flats, typically along tidal creeks (Qiu et al 2013(Qiu et al , 2014. All mangrovevegetated areas in Pearl Bay are included in the Beilun Estuary Mangrove Nature Reserve (Ma et al 2011, China Mangrove Conservation Network, www.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 , respectively. Compared with the populations elsewhere in China, the average cover of Hongpai Port (56.33 ± 14.04%) was higher than that of Pearl Bay, Fangcheng Port City, Guangxi (55%), and Tangjia Bay, Zhuhai, Guangdong (53.33%) [23,44]. In contrast, the average covers of Xinying Port and Xinying Bay were relatively low, at 7.08 ± 16.61 and 8.46 ± 10.05%, respectively, which were lower than the average cover in most regions of China [2,23,42,44].…”
Section: Biological Characteristics Of Halophila Beccariimentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Compared with the populations elsewhere in China, the average cover of Hongpai Port (56.33 ± 14.04%) was higher than that of Pearl Bay, Fangcheng Port City, Guangxi (55%), and Tangjia Bay, Zhuhai, Guangdong (53.33%) [23,44]. In contrast, the average covers of Xinying Port and Xinying Bay were relatively low, at 7.08 ± 16.61 and 8.46 ± 10.05%, respectively, which were lower than the average cover in most regions of China [2,23,42,44]. In terms of stem and branch density, Huachang Bay, Dongzhai Port, Xiaohai, Laoyehai, Xinying Bay, and Xinying Port had medium to low densities of stems and branches relative to other Chinese H. beccarii populations [24,44,46].…”
Section: Biological Characteristics Of Halophila Beccariimentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations