1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.1992.tb00596.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population density, growth and diet of eels, Anguilla anguilla L., in two rivers in eastern England

Abstract: The population density, growth and diets of eels, Anguilla anguilla L-, from four sites on two rivers in eastern England were studied over 2 years. Eel population density varied greatly between sites and seasons, few eels being caught during the winter. Mean population densities ranged from 50[o5I8eeis/haand mean biomass from 35 to 210kg/ha. Older eels were niiore numerous at upstream sites. Growth rates in the two rivers were generally similar, but eels 9-13 years old at upstream sites were significantly larg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
46
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports the hypothesis that the parasite is not restricted to freshwater and can potentially be transferred to new locations through all salinity regimes and through many paratenic hosts (reviewed by Taraschewski 2006). The vast array of potential hosts and the eel's generalist feeding behavior (Helfman et al 1987, Barak & Mason 1992 ensure that the parasite's distribution will not be limited by host availability. Yellow American eels exhibit homing, home site fidelity, and limited home ranges (Parker 1995, Oliveira 1997, Morrison & Secor 2003, and thus their movements are unlikely to contribute to the parasite's spread between river systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This supports the hypothesis that the parasite is not restricted to freshwater and can potentially be transferred to new locations through all salinity regimes and through many paratenic hosts (reviewed by Taraschewski 2006). The vast array of potential hosts and the eel's generalist feeding behavior (Helfman et al 1987, Barak & Mason 1992 ensure that the parasite's distribution will not be limited by host availability. Yellow American eels exhibit homing, home site fidelity, and limited home ranges (Parker 1995, Oliveira 1997, Morrison & Secor 2003, and thus their movements are unlikely to contribute to the parasite's spread between river systems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…From 1998, watershed saturation would have increased mortality of young eels entering the downstream-saturated rivers because of competition and cannibalism behaviours (SINHA and JONES, 1967;KNIGHTS, 1987;LAMOTHE et al, 2000). A replacement by larger eels would not be apparent in the shallow sectors, because the foraging area might not coincide with the resting place located in deeper sectors of the tributary (LAFFAILLE et al, 2004), as niche breadth expands with increasing size of eels (BARAK and MASON, 1992). These observations would indicate that downstream and middle stream sectors reached carrying capacity in 1998 and 2000.…”
Section: Density Dependent Effectsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Eel habitat partitioning varied according to habitat and the resulting variability explains the lack of significance in temporal trend . Seasonal fluctuations in eel densities probably occurred (RASMUSSEN, 1983;MORIARTY, 1986;BARAK and MASON, 1992;LOBÓN-CERVIÁ et al, 1995) but had a limited effect when compared to habitat variability, as the sampling period remained in late summer.…”
Section: Density Dependent Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…eels exploiting more efficiently an environment which they have already experienced. The attachment to precise loci may proportionally be higher in densely populated environments, such as the Awirs stream, where the population density is sensibly higher than in most European waters (Tesch, 1977;Lobon-Cervia et al, 1990;Barak & Mason, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%