1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00385-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population density and childhood leukaemia: results of the EUROCLUS study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…27 In Western countries, neighborhoods with residential density greater than 500 persons/km 2 are usually classified as densely populated areas for epidemiologic studies. 28 However, in China, a residential density of 500 persons/km 2 may be considered a sparsely populated area. This is likely to be an important factor contributing to the differences in the associations of residential density with physical activity in this study compared previously reported studies from Western countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 In Western countries, neighborhoods with residential density greater than 500 persons/km 2 are usually classified as densely populated areas for epidemiologic studies. 28 However, in China, a residential density of 500 persons/km 2 may be considered a sparsely populated area. This is likely to be an important factor contributing to the differences in the associations of residential density with physical activity in this study compared previously reported studies from Western countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EUROCLUS study evidenced the influence of population density on the incidence of childhood acute leukaemia (Alexander et al, 1999). An extra-Poisson variation was actually observed in the areas with o500 inhabitants km À2 while the moderately densely populated areas were associated with the highest incidence rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properties of rural areas include low population density, relative isolation, limited commuting or visitation from other areas, etc, although specific definitions vary by county. Others have explored the use of population density as the predictor of high cancer rates (rather than population mixing) with somewhat mixed results (Alexander et al, 1990(Alexander et al, , 1998b(Alexander et al, , 1999Ross et al, 1999). One recent paper provided somewhat contradictory results, showing that increased risk of childhood leukaemia associated with inward migration was more marked in urban than rural areas (Dickinson et al, 2002a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%