2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2016.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population characteristics and coexistence of puku (Kobus vardonii) and impala (Aepyceros melampus) in and around Kafue National Park, Zambia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To refine this analysis, we split the 18 transects into smaller segments to produce finer sampling units for which we recorded covariates. We segmented each transect based Herbivore densities in KNP are low as a result of anthropogenic prey depletion (Midlane, 2014;Rduch, 2016) except for areas immediately adjacent to the Kafue River, so these surveys provided enough sightings to fit distance sampling models for only three species (impala, puku, and warthog). A set of similarly sized grazers (hartebeest, roan, wildebeest, and zebra) had too few sightings to allow for separate analysis, so we pooled these sightings to yield a total of 71 observations, which allowed a precise estimate of their collective density that corrected for the effects of vegetation type and distance on detection.…”
Section: Species Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To refine this analysis, we split the 18 transects into smaller segments to produce finer sampling units for which we recorded covariates. We segmented each transect based Herbivore densities in KNP are low as a result of anthropogenic prey depletion (Midlane, 2014;Rduch, 2016) except for areas immediately adjacent to the Kafue River, so these surveys provided enough sightings to fit distance sampling models for only three species (impala, puku, and warthog). A set of similarly sized grazers (hartebeest, roan, wildebeest, and zebra) had too few sightings to allow for separate analysis, so we pooled these sightings to yield a total of 71 observations, which allowed a precise estimate of their collective density that corrected for the effects of vegetation type and distance on detection.…”
Section: Species Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, even when methods that account for detection are used, a common approach is to model the density of groups with distance sampling [10] and then convert group density to individual density using a mean group size [10,12]. This conversion uses either mean group size across all observations or across focal categorical variables, such as vegetation types [13]. Because ungulate group size is typically influenced by the same variables that affect the distribution of herds, this approach may not be entirely accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Puku and waterbuck can be considered equally important prey for hyaena in the study areas. Comparable to the closely related kob antelopes ( Kobus kob ) in Senegal (Di Silvestre, Novelli & Bogliani, ), puku reach high population densities in the study areas, especially in grassland areas (Rduch, ), which make it an ideal prey for hyaenas. Spotted hyaenas also consume hartebeest species (Di Silvestre, Novelli & Bogliani, ) or sable (Henschel & Skinner, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…) both adjoining the Kafue River, situated on its eastern bank (26°22′27E‐26°25′35E, 14°39′5S‐14°41′60S and 26°58′43E‐26°4′21E, 15°11′27S‐15°20′2S). The search for scats (27 August to 6 September 2010 in the northern study area and 10 July to 25 September 2010 in the southern study area) was conducted at random while performing other research tasks (Rduch, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%