2011
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.00698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population-Based Study on the Prevalence of Spirometric Obstructive Pattern in Porto, Portugal

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of obstructive lung disease (OLD) based on clinical grounds is challenging. There have been no population-based COPD studies that collected pulmonary function data in Portugal, a country in transition between phases 2 and 3 of the smoking epidemic. OB-JECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of obstructive pattern on spirometry in a representative sample of adults from Porto, Portugal. METHODS: We conducted a health survey between 2001 and 2003, and 758 participants > 40 years old had reli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We identified 24,148 patients that were classified with ICPC-2 "Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (R95)" out of 937,817 individuals, resulting in a prevalence of COPD of 2.57 per 100,000. The calculated prevalence of COPD in the Central Region of Portugal was significantly lower than the prevalence estimated for this disease in past studies, both worldwide and in Portugal [9,10,[26][27][28][29]. There are many aspects that can contribute to such a low prevalence in this study: the methodology used in most observational studies being different from the clinical one we used, which is based on existing records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…We identified 24,148 patients that were classified with ICPC-2 "Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (R95)" out of 937,817 individuals, resulting in a prevalence of COPD of 2.57 per 100,000. The calculated prevalence of COPD in the Central Region of Portugal was significantly lower than the prevalence estimated for this disease in past studies, both worldwide and in Portugal [9,10,[26][27][28][29]. There are many aspects that can contribute to such a low prevalence in this study: the methodology used in most observational studies being different from the clinical one we used, which is based on existing records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%