2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-008-0265-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population and segregation data on 17 Y-STRs: results of a GEP-ISFG collaborative study

Abstract: A collaborative work was carried out by the Spanish and Portuguese International Society for Forensic Genetics Working Group in order to extend the existing data on Y-short tandem repeat (STR) mutations at the 17 Y chromosome STR loci included in the AmpFlSTR YFiler kit (Applied Biosystems): DYS19, DYS385, DYS389I, DYS389II, DYS390, DYS391, DYS392, DYS393, DYS437, DYS438, DYS439, DYS448, DYS456, DYS458, DYS635, and GATA H4.1. In a sample of 701 father/son pairs, 26 mutations were observed among 11,917 allele t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
21
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(12 reference statements)
6
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed locus-specific mutation rate ranged between 0 of DYS391, DYS392, DYS437, DYS448, GATA H4.1 and 6.961 Â 10 ), higher than some previously studies [4,5] but more similar to other ones [1,6].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The observed locus-specific mutation rate ranged between 0 of DYS391, DYS392, DYS437, DYS448, GATA H4.1 and 6.961 Â 10 ), higher than some previously studies [4,5] but more similar to other ones [1,6].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…the pairwise Rst genetic distances analysis obtained among male population sample from cabo Verde and others from Iberia and Africa sub-saharan, showed a similar significant differentiation from Iberian populations (0.13352<Rst<0.17027, p=0.00000) [9,10,11] and from Africa sub-saharan populations (0.13401<Rst<0.15268, p=0.00000) [12,13,14].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Regarding the European situation, the picture emerging in the few articles published in the international scientific literature is unclear. Some subdisciplines, such as forensic genetics, toxicology and anthropology, have long taken steps towards harmonisation, with the creation of European guidelines by means of consensus conferences [2][3][4][5][6], collaborative exercises and proficiency testing programmes [7][8][9][10][11]. Other subdisciplines or medicolegal branches, such as forensic pathology and forensic psychiatry, invalidity and biological damage, still lack a process of drafting and/ or consensus, at both a national and a supranational level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%