2018
DOI: 10.1111/brv.12409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population and evolutionary dynamics in spatially structured seasonally varying environments

Abstract: Increasingly imperative objectives in ecology are to understand and forecast population dynamic and evolutionary responses to seasonal environmental variation and change. Such population and evolutionary dynamics result from immediate and lagged responses of all key life-history traits, and resulting demographic rates that affect population growth rate, to seasonal environmental conditions and population density. However, existing population dynamic and eco-evolutionary theory and models have not yet fully enc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
75
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
(515 reference statements)
2
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Migratory species are found across all major taxonomic groups (Dingle & Drake, 2007), an increasing number of which are recognized as partial migrants (Chapman, Brönmark, Nilsson, & Hansson, 2011b;Meller et al, 2016;Reid et al, 2018), wherein migratory and non-migratory individuals exist within the same population of a species (Chapman, Brönmark, Nilsson, & Hansson, 2011a;Lundberg, 1988). Previously underrepresented in migration literature (Chapman et al, 2011a;Sekercioglu, 2010), partial migration has seen an increase in published studies only in recent years (Meller et al, 2016)-at least in part owing the greater empirical research enabled by advances in tracking technologies (Chapman et al, 2011a(Chapman et al, , 2011bReid et al, 2018). The emergence of rigorous study on this topic represents an opportunity to address unanswered questions surrounding the evolution and maintenance of partial migration (and behavioural polymorphisms in general), the ecological consequences of different migratory patterns and the evolution of migration itself (Chapman et al, 2011b;Sekercioglu, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migratory species are found across all major taxonomic groups (Dingle & Drake, 2007), an increasing number of which are recognized as partial migrants (Chapman, Brönmark, Nilsson, & Hansson, 2011b;Meller et al, 2016;Reid et al, 2018), wherein migratory and non-migratory individuals exist within the same population of a species (Chapman, Brönmark, Nilsson, & Hansson, 2011a;Lundberg, 1988). Previously underrepresented in migration literature (Chapman et al, 2011a;Sekercioglu, 2010), partial migration has seen an increase in published studies only in recent years (Meller et al, 2016)-at least in part owing the greater empirical research enabled by advances in tracking technologies (Chapman et al, 2011a(Chapman et al, , 2011bReid et al, 2018). The emergence of rigorous study on this topic represents an opportunity to address unanswered questions surrounding the evolution and maintenance of partial migration (and behavioural polymorphisms in general), the ecological consequences of different migratory patterns and the evolution of migration itself (Chapman et al, 2011b;Sekercioglu, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the many decision events involved in foraging, certain important key decisions in the life of organisms are made only once or a few times, and can offer similar variance sensitive scenarios of choosing between 'safe but low gain' versus 'high risk / high gain' options. For example, decisions related to seasonal migration, including timing, choice of route, choice of destination, or even whether to migrate at all (Hebblewhite and Merrill 2009;Bauer et al 2011;Grist et al 2017;Reid et al 2018), which are likely to include strong bet-hedging elements if there are correlations in the payoffs among related individuals that all choose the risky strategy. Therefore, ongoing rapid changes in the spatial scale of synchrony in resource availability or environmental variation as a consequence of anthropogenic climate change, habitat change or habitat destruction can all have dramatic effects on population viability (Shuter et al 2011;Koenig and Liebhold 2016;Walter et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximising body condition does, however, not maximise fitness as individuals also have to deal with unpredictable environmental changes at larger spatiotemporal scales. Organisms therefore need to disperse and expose themselves to costs largely exceeding those experienced during routine movements [7,8]. Movement is thus a fundamental behaviour in life history and the result of a continuous decision making process in terms of how, when and where to displace [1,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%