2019
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv.8864204.v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Popular Integration Grids Can Result in Large Errors in DFT-Computed Free Energies

Abstract: <div>Density functional theory (DFT) has emerged as a powerful tool for analyzing organic and organometallic systems and proved remarkably accurate in computing the small free energy differences that underpin many chemical phenomena (e.g. regio- and stereoselective reactions). We show that the lack of rotational invariance of popular DFT integration grids reveals large uncertainties in computed free energies for isomerizations, torsional barriers, and regio- and stereoselective reactions. The result is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that for the largest system with 94 atoms (lopinavir) the frequency calculation took about 7.5 and 0.03 hr, respectively, at the DFT and SQM levels showing the tremendous speed‐up at very little loss of accuracy. Furthermore, the severe sensitivity of DFT‐computed thermostatistical data (vibrational partition function) on the numerical integration grid for low‐frequency modes has been pointed out recently 159 . Eliminating this issue would require the use of very large, computationally costly integration grids in the calculation of the nuclear Hessians with DFT methods.…”
Section: Example Applications and Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that for the largest system with 94 atoms (lopinavir) the frequency calculation took about 7.5 and 0.03 hr, respectively, at the DFT and SQM levels showing the tremendous speed‐up at very little loss of accuracy. Furthermore, the severe sensitivity of DFT‐computed thermostatistical data (vibrational partition function) on the numerical integration grid for low‐frequency modes has been pointed out recently 159 . Eliminating this issue would require the use of very large, computationally costly integration grids in the calculation of the nuclear Hessians with DFT methods.…”
Section: Example Applications and Benchmarkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using the Gibbs free energy value of -271.9 kcal/mol for the proton in solvent. [50][51][52] The training set and linear regressions used in this work can be found in the Supporting Information (Table S1 and Table S2). The pK a of the terminal Thr1N atom is documented to range from 6 to 9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we turned our attention to electronic structure methods in the gas phase and implicit DCM solvent (Figure 3 and Table S3). To compare the binding affinity across a range of quinone/Pd2L4 cages, and considering the computational cost and challenges associated with entropy calculations, [63][64][65] we analyzed relative energy differences (∆∆Ebind) rather than Gibbs free energy differences (∆∆Gbind), i.e without considering entropic or zero-point-energy corrections. 66 It is important to note that while reasonably predictions of absolute binding free energies have been presented for organic host-guest complexes, errors of at least 1-4 kcal mol −1 have been reported for such systems, mostly due to vibrational anharmonicity and solvent effects.…”
Section: Efficient Protocol For Binding Affinity Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%