2020
DOI: 10.1177/0040571x19883534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pop science and pop theology: new ways of exploring an old dialogue

Abstract: While the contemporary media scene often reinforces the conflict model of science and religion, it also may offer new opportunities in moving present discussions of science and religion forward. Looking at news reporting, the new priesthood of scientific celebrities and the universal popularity of The Simpsons and Star Wars, this article argues that in the importance of the person, imagination and narrative, the scientist and the theologian can rediscover older and fruitful resources.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One does not have to look too far to find examples of the “conflict thesis” (Wilkinson 2020; Lightman 2019) playing out in popular culture with examples being found in new atheist literature, comments made by comedians (Ricky Gervais and Stephen Fry) and TV programs/documentaries (Big Bang Theory and The Root of all Evil). The conflict thesis (the idea that science and religion are fundamentally opposed to each other) can easily be replicated in the media by constructing debates between scientists who are antireligious and preachers who are antievolution (Gundlach 2018, 163).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One does not have to look too far to find examples of the “conflict thesis” (Wilkinson 2020; Lightman 2019) playing out in popular culture with examples being found in new atheist literature, comments made by comedians (Ricky Gervais and Stephen Fry) and TV programs/documentaries (Big Bang Theory and The Root of all Evil). The conflict thesis (the idea that science and religion are fundamentally opposed to each other) can easily be replicated in the media by constructing debates between scientists who are antireligious and preachers who are antievolution (Gundlach 2018, 163).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%