2014
DOI: 10.1111/rest.12080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor women and parish public health in sixteenth‐century London

Abstract: While there is much excellent scholarship on the topics of poor relief and plague management in England, less attention has been paid to how they function together, especially given that they were housed in the same administrative unit of the parish. This article focuses on one key area of overlap: the medical labour performed by poor women as nurses or ‘keepers’ for their neighbours and as ‘searchers’ for epidemiological purposes in the period 1560–1600. Examining primarily parish records, such as churchwarde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The poor who were sick with plague and qualified for care funded by the parish would have received those ministrations from other poor women, the equivalent of our modern-day, underpaid front line care workers. Monkhoff narrates a report dated 1582 of such women of one parish declining to look after plague victims, although it meant losing that income, and then one of them, Goody Henchpoole, changing her mind [ 48 ]. She was appointed a ‘visitor’ of quarantined houses – after 1593 she would have to swear an oath, for persons so appointed could order the quarantining of a house, and the punishment for failing to carry out their duties in a solemn manner was the more stringent for a sworn official – and a searcher of the dead who had to verify the cause of death of those in her care who had expired.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor who were sick with plague and qualified for care funded by the parish would have received those ministrations from other poor women, the equivalent of our modern-day, underpaid front line care workers. Monkhoff narrates a report dated 1582 of such women of one parish declining to look after plague victims, although it meant losing that income, and then one of them, Goody Henchpoole, changing her mind [ 48 ]. She was appointed a ‘visitor’ of quarantined houses – after 1593 she would have to swear an oath, for persons so appointed could order the quarantining of a house, and the punishment for failing to carry out their duties in a solemn manner was the more stringent for a sworn official – and a searcher of the dead who had to verify the cause of death of those in her care who had expired.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%