2011
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e17502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor performance status small cell lung cancer: Who should we treat?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar retrospective study by Azam et al in 246 patients with SCLC and PS 3 or 4 reported that 80 patients (33%) received chemotherapy (carboplatin þ etoposide in 41 [17%], single agent carboplatin in 32 [13%], oral etoposide in 7 [3%]); the remaining 166 (67%) received BSC. Similar to the results of our study, the authors reported that the median OS was 2 months (95% CI, 1.71-2.28) in the patients managed with BSC, compared to 6 months (95% CI, 3.70-8.29) in patients who received chemotherapy; p < 0.01 [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A similar retrospective study by Azam et al in 246 patients with SCLC and PS 3 or 4 reported that 80 patients (33%) received chemotherapy (carboplatin þ etoposide in 41 [17%], single agent carboplatin in 32 [13%], oral etoposide in 7 [3%]); the remaining 166 (67%) received BSC. Similar to the results of our study, the authors reported that the median OS was 2 months (95% CI, 1.71-2.28) in the patients managed with BSC, compared to 6 months (95% CI, 3.70-8.29) in patients who received chemotherapy; p < 0.01 [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%