2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor Outcomes after Whole Brain Radiotherapy in Patients with Brain Metastases: Results from an International Multicentre Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study breast and lung cancer were the most common primary sites, too. Wolf et al (2013), Windsor (Windsor et al, 2013) et al andSaha et al (2013) in the US, Australia and India respectively showed that lung cancer is the most common primary site. This discrepancy maybe due to the fact that breast cancer is more prevalent in our country and in our province, too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study breast and lung cancer were the most common primary sites, too. Wolf et al (2013), Windsor (Windsor et al, 2013) et al andSaha et al (2013) in the US, Australia and India respectively showed that lung cancer is the most common primary site. This discrepancy maybe due to the fact that breast cancer is more prevalent in our country and in our province, too.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher BBB pass rate and targeted accumulation of intracranial metastasis are two important properties of Erlotinib in NSCLC, therefore, the combined function of treating brain metastasis and strengthening radiosensitivity of Erlotinib is the theoretical basis of EGFR-TKI concomitant with whole brain radiotherapy (Windsor et al, 2013). Zhang et al, explored the clinical effect and tolerance of 150 mg/d Erlotinib concomitant with 40Gy/20Fx whole brain radiotherapy for 12 NSCLC patients with multiple brain metastasis, indicating some satisfied achievements that total RR, CR, PR, medium PFS, medium OS were 100%, 66.7%, 33.3%, 8 months and 10 months respectively, with 3 rash in I stage and 1 mild diarrhea (Zhang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents say that WBRT improves palliation by prolonging intracerebral control [4]. Opponents say that WBRT does not increase survival, may cause neurocognitive problems and may not prevent intracerebral progression [5,6]. A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed to resolve this controversy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%