Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3078081.3078107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor Man's OCR Post-Correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 34 teams registered to the competition, for a final number of 5 submissions. Note that we received an extra answer from a Swedish team that applied their word-based method [6] but couldn't get more than 10-20% on the training dataset, so they decided to not submit their results. The following section gives a brief description of the 5 submitted methods.…”
Section: Submitted Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In total, 34 teams registered to the competition, for a final number of 5 submissions. Note that we received an extra answer from a Swedish team that applied their word-based method [6] but couldn't get more than 10-20% on the training dataset, so they decided to not submit their results. The following section gives a brief description of the 5 submitted methods.…”
Section: Submitted Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digitized documents come from different collections available, among others, in national libraries or universities. The corresponding GT comes from initiatives such as HIMANIS 4 , IMPACT 5 , IMPRESSO 6 , Open data of National Library of Finland 7 , GT4HistOCR [4] and RECEIPT [5].…”
Section: B Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…H. Hammarström et al propose a language-independent Post-correction system, without supervision or human intervention to improve OCR results in historical documents [22]. The idea of the method is based on the fact that two words are variants of each other if their distribution similarity exceeds what is expected by chance of their similarity of form.…”
Section: Methods Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22: Results of the substitution method considering the analysis of all the characters with certainty restriction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%