2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor immune response to coronavirus disease vaccines in decompensated cirrhosis patients and liver transplant recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies investigating the vaccine-induced immune response in patients with cirrhosis following vaccination against other pathogens, such as HBV or influenza virus, suggest an impaired humoral immune response in decompensated cirrhosis 107 108. This is also the case for SARS-CoV-2, where the antibody response was particularly weak in decompensated patients104 106 109 (figure 3A,B). The impaired humoral immune response in these patients may be explained by an altered cytokine phenotype with higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-2 or IL-6 in advanced cirrhosis 110.…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 and The Adaptive Immune Responsementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Studies investigating the vaccine-induced immune response in patients with cirrhosis following vaccination against other pathogens, such as HBV or influenza virus, suggest an impaired humoral immune response in decompensated cirrhosis 107 108. This is also the case for SARS-CoV-2, where the antibody response was particularly weak in decompensated patients104 106 109 (figure 3A,B). The impaired humoral immune response in these patients may be explained by an altered cytokine phenotype with higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-2 or IL-6 in advanced cirrhosis 110.…”
Section: Sars-cov-2 and The Adaptive Immune Responsementioning
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast with the study from John BV et al, antibody responses after adenovirus-based vaccines were poorer when compared with mRNA-based vaccines, especially in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, in two other studies [ 43 , 58 ]. More specifically, Thuluvath P., et al showed poorer antibody responses in patients with cirrhosis receiving the Ad.26.COV2.S vaccine when compared with those receiving the mRNA vaccines; however only seven PWLC received the Ad.26.COV2.S vaccine in this study [ 43 ].…”
Section: Viral Vector-based Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…More specifically, Thuluvath P., et al showed poorer antibody responses in patients with cirrhosis receiving the Ad.26.COV2.S vaccine when compared with those receiving the mRNA vaccines; however only seven PWLC received the Ad.26.COV2.S vaccine in this study [ 43 ]. Likewise, in a study by Kulkarni A et al, patients with decompensated cirrhosis showed suboptimal humoral and cellular immune responses after ChAdOx1 vaccination [ 58 ]. More specifically, 34% of patients with decompensated cirrhosis were non-responders, while CD4-naïve, CD4 effector, B- and B-memory cells were lower in patients with decompensated cirrhosis [ 58 ].…”
Section: Viral Vector-based Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1] Compared with compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis (especially for severe grade) is associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 infection and vaccine hyporesponsiveness. [4,5] Therefore, to fully explore the association between cirrhosis and BSI, it is necessary to supplement the subgroup analysis of decompensated cirrhosis and further stratified analysis according to different decompensated classifications. There is a possibility that the severe decompensated cirrhosis is associated with a higher risk of BSI than noncirrhotic patients with CLD.Finally, the number "10,441" in the "Approach and Results" subsection of the "Abstract" section should be corrected with the number "10,241" because "10,241" is the number of vaccinated CLD patients with cirrhosis, while "10,441" is the number of unvaccinated CLD patients with cirrhosis and SARS-CoV-2 infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%