2006
DOI: 10.1177/014107680609901219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poor Handwriting Remains a Significant Problem in Medicine

Abstract: care, bringing the patient back five times so that we can complete our history taking, examination, investigation and management plan. From the patients' perspective it takes no account of the amount of time a patient may spend trying to get an appointment and waiting to be seen. The net result of our 1948 view of the consultation is that we have to keep seeing patients more regularly, creating a selfperpetuating demand for appointments that are never quite long enough. We seem to be fulfilling the negative co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In retrospect, we believe writing became more illegible with increased QA implementation because treatment providers spent relatively more time attempting to manage their records during QA and may have felt rushed correcting errors for which they were responsible. Of course, illegible writing hinders professional correspondence among service providers and has been found to influence malpractice claims (Sokol & Hettige, 2006). Therefore, a method of objectifying the evaluation of handwriting (and perhaps incentivizing providers in writing neatly) in the examined QA program is warranted.…”
Section: Discussion and Applications To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In retrospect, we believe writing became more illegible with increased QA implementation because treatment providers spent relatively more time attempting to manage their records during QA and may have felt rushed correcting errors for which they were responsible. Of course, illegible writing hinders professional correspondence among service providers and has been found to influence malpractice claims (Sokol & Hettige, 2006). Therefore, a method of objectifying the evaluation of handwriting (and perhaps incentivizing providers in writing neatly) in the examined QA program is warranted.…”
Section: Discussion and Applications To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(22,23) The immediate benefit of CPOE is the accuracy of the medication order, improving patient safety in addition to saving nurses and pharmacists from deciphering a doctor's poor handwriting. (10,24) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] Furthermore, the printing of medication dosage and directions on the label ensures legibility of the prescription and addresses a common source of medication errors: poor or illegible handwriting. [11] Designing the Patient Identification Module While Honduras has a national policy of issuing identity cards to its citizens, we did not know the prevalence of this identifier in our catchment area. Furthermore, only citizens above the age of 18 are issued an identity card, leaving children without any means of unique identification.…”
Section: System Design and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%