2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pooled versus separate measurements of tree-ring stable isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most tree‐ring studies in natural environments have yielded results consistent with this strategy (Frank et al, ; Keller et al, ; Peñuelas et al, ; Saurer et al, ). However, there is also empirical support for plants following scenario (i) with constant c i (Dorado Liñán et al, ) or scenario (ii) where c i increases at the same rate as c a (McCarroll et al, ; Treydte et al, ). Other tree‐ring studies moreover have indicated intermediate situations between the constant c i and constant c i / c a scenarios, implying a more than expected increase in iWUE leaf , or between the constant c a – c i and constant c i / c a scenarios, associated with relatively moderate increase in iWUE leaf (Andreu‐Hayles et al, ; Lavergne et al, ; Leonardi et al, ; Urrutia‐Jalabert, Malhi, Barichivich, & Lara, ).…”
Section: Trends Reported In the Literature From Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most tree‐ring studies in natural environments have yielded results consistent with this strategy (Frank et al, ; Keller et al, ; Peñuelas et al, ; Saurer et al, ). However, there is also empirical support for plants following scenario (i) with constant c i (Dorado Liñán et al, ) or scenario (ii) where c i increases at the same rate as c a (McCarroll et al, ; Treydte et al, ). Other tree‐ring studies moreover have indicated intermediate situations between the constant c i and constant c i / c a scenarios, implying a more than expected increase in iWUE leaf , or between the constant c a – c i and constant c i / c a scenarios, associated with relatively moderate increase in iWUE leaf (Andreu‐Hayles et al, ; Lavergne et al, ; Leonardi et al, ; Urrutia‐Jalabert, Malhi, Barichivich, & Lara, ).…”
Section: Trends Reported In the Literature From Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cost-effective solution is to pool the wood from several trees prior to the chemistry and mass spectrometry (Borella et al, 1998;Dorada-Liñan, 2011;Lavergne et al, 2017;Leavitt, 2008;Liu et al, 2015;Szymczak et al, 2012). A cost-effective solution is to pool the wood from several trees prior to the chemistry and mass spectrometry (Borella et al, 1998;Dorada-Liñan, 2011;Lavergne et al, 2017;Leavitt, 2008;Liu et al, 2015;Szymczak et al, 2012).…”
Section: 1029/2019gb006195mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is clear potential for constructing long, well-replicated isotope chronologies using oak, this work can be constrained by the high cost of separating the alpha cellulose from individual latewood samples and measuring the samples individually by mass spectrometry. A cost-effective solution is to pool the wood from several trees prior to the chemistry and mass spectrometry (Borella et al, 1998;Dorada-Liñan, 2011;Lavergne et al, 2017;Leavitt, 2008;Liu et al, 2015;Szymczak et al, 2012). However, doubts have been raised about the wisdom of such an approach, as it has been argued that the isotope ratios from the rings of individual trees are influenced by tree age as well as by climate, and therefore require statistical detrending to remove these nonclimatic trends (Esper et al, 2010;Helama et al, 2015).…”
Section: 1029/2019gb006195mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small ring size would have also created an unacceptably high risk of measurement error. Several recent studies have tested and proved that representativeness of pooled isotopic series for tree-ring carbon (d 13 C) compared to the individual isotopic series (Leavitt 2008;Liñán et al 2011;Liu et al 2012;Szymczak et al 2012;Woodley et al 2012). As the pooled mean will be within the mean obtained by averaging d 13 C values of individual trees, so that the ''error'' (probably more appropriately called ''the difference'') is negligible with respect to the error due to the preparation and analysis (Leavitt 2008).…”
Section: Stable Carbon Isotope Analysis and The Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%