1991
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910490110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pooled analysis of 3 european case‐control studies: I. Reproductive factors and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer

Abstract: The role of reproductive factors in the aetiology of epithelial ovarian cancer has been re-assessed in a meta-analysis of 3 hospital-based case-control studies conducted in Europe (i.e. Italy, the United Kingdom and Greece), providing a total dataset of 1,140 cases and 2,724 controls. Multiple logistic regression models were used to obtain relative risk (RR) estimates adjusted for study centre, age, socio-cultural indicators, age at menopause, and oral contraceptive use. The risk decreased with increasing numb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
75
1
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
75
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding that adverse birth outcomes, including pregnancy losses, were not significantly associated with ovarian cancer risk is consistent with most (for example, Hartge et al, 1989;Chen et al, 1992;Polychronopoulou et al, 1993), but not all previous studies (for example, Whittemore et al, 1988;Negri et al, 1991). The reduced risk observed in association with preterm, full term, or twin births is consistent with the protective effect of parity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our finding that adverse birth outcomes, including pregnancy losses, were not significantly associated with ovarian cancer risk is consistent with most (for example, Hartge et al, 1989;Chen et al, 1992;Polychronopoulou et al, 1993), but not all previous studies (for example, Whittemore et al, 1988;Negri et al, 1991). The reduced risk observed in association with preterm, full term, or twin births is consistent with the protective effect of parity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In this study, late age at first birth was associated with reduced risk, although the effect was observed only in women who had used oral contraceptives and whose ovarian cancer was diagnosed before menopause. A few previous studies (Purdie et al, 1995), including the collaborative analysis of 12 population-based studies (Whittemore et al, 1992) also noted an inverse relationship between age at first birth and risk, but most found no association (for example, Risch et al, 1994), or an increased risk (for example, Negri et al, 1991). In contrast to previous studies (Risch et al, 1994;Salazar-Martinez et al, 1999), we also found a significant association between increasing age at last birth and reduced risk.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Women who have never had children are twice as likely to develop this disease. First pregnancy at an early age, early menopause, and the use of oral contraceptives have been associated with lower risks of ovarian cancer [27]. The relationship of these variables to fallopian tube cancer is unclear.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BRCA mutations may also occur in women without a family history of breast/ovarian cancer, and genetic testing should be considered in patients from ethnic groups where there is a high incidence of founder mutations (e.g. Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry), and in women with high-grade serous cancers under the age of 70 years [26][27][28][29][30]. Australian guidelines [34] suggest that all women with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed under the age of 70 should be considered for BRCA mutation testing independent of family history and histological subtype.…”
Section: Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research show correlation. One of basic factors of ovarian cancer is childlessness and anovulation [12]. In a research by McGovan et al [13] risk of ovarian cancer in nullipara was 2.45-times higher compared to multipara and 1.27-times higher compared to unipara.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%