2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4427-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ponderal index at birth associates with later risk of gestational diabetes mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous studies that have shown birth weight to be inversely associated with risk for GDM [1618, 29, 30], and a more recent study from 2017 that reported ponderal index to be inversely associated with GDM [22], we also found an increased risk for GDM in women with a small BSA at birth and a lower risk for women with a large BSA at birth. However, we did not detect a similar statistically significant relationship between ponderal index and risk for GDM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to previous studies that have shown birth weight to be inversely associated with risk for GDM [1618, 29, 30], and a more recent study from 2017 that reported ponderal index to be inversely associated with GDM [22], we also found an increased risk for GDM in women with a small BSA at birth and a lower risk for women with a large BSA at birth. However, we did not detect a similar statistically significant relationship between ponderal index and risk for GDM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, birth weight is a very crude measurement of body size at birth. Interestingly, only one recent study has assessed the relationship between maternal birth size using ponderal index (PI) as a measurement of body size at birth and risk for GDM, showing an inverse association [22]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PI may not be a better indicator of foetal morbidity 13 than BW, it reflects potential asymmetric growth due to a nonoptimal periconceptional environment as well as neonatal fat mass 19 . Additionally, variations in PI have been associated with adverse long-term consequences 20 . The multivariate analyses performed here show that a high PI at birth is an infertility risk factor in adulthood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birth weight was recorded in 100 g groups and analyzed in three categories: ≤2500 low birth weight; 2500–4000 normal birth weight; and ≥4000 g high birth weight. Ponderal index, calculated as birth weight [Kg]/birth length [meters] 3 , was also included as it is theoretically assumed to measure fetal growth and thereby discriminate between intra-uterine well-fed (high ponderal index) and disproportionate growth restricted newborns (low ponderal index) [40]. Ponderal index was analyzed as three-category variable (1 st quintile; 2 nd -4 th quintile; 5th quintile).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%