2015
DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ponatinib: Accelerated Disapproval

Abstract: “Accelerated Approval” (AA) has addressed important unmet needs in oncology. However, it is only justified if the drug fills a serious gap because such approval entails risk and leads to marketing based on incomplete information about toxicity, dose, and therapeutic potential. Furthermore, the policy of requiring companion diagnostics for AA of drugs that target specific mutations needs further discussion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mechanism by which this effect occurs is absolutely unclear and there are no data in the medical literature relating to this interesting issue. However, we know from registered studies that the approved daily dose of 45 mg of ponatinib largely exceeds the pharmacokinetic requirements for inhibiting T315I ABL and suppressing the growth of other mutant clones [14] . This aspect could be supported by the persistent molecular remission observed in our patient, also during the drug reduction to a daily dose of 15 mg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mechanism by which this effect occurs is absolutely unclear and there are no data in the medical literature relating to this interesting issue. However, we know from registered studies that the approved daily dose of 45 mg of ponatinib largely exceeds the pharmacokinetic requirements for inhibiting T315I ABL and suppressing the growth of other mutant clones [14] . This aspect could be supported by the persistent molecular remission observed in our patient, also during the drug reduction to a daily dose of 15 mg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Additional follow-up from these ponatinib trials has since revealed a much higher frequency of serious adverse vascular events (48% and 24% in the phase I and II trials, respectively). 38 This concern led the U.S. FDA and Ariad Pharmaceuticals to abruptly withdraw ponatinib from the market in October 2013. Importantly, an ongoing phase III trial (EPIC- Exploring Ponatinib In untreated patients with CML) comparing ponatinib to imatinib for the first-line treatment of CML was also closed, patients were crossed over to imatinib, and their follow-up was terminated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, an ongoing phase III trial (EPIC- Exploring Ponatinib In untreated patients with CML) comparing ponatinib to imatinib for the first-line treatment of CML was also closed, patients were crossed over to imatinib, and their follow-up was terminated. 38 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulation of these adverse effects caused the trial to be put on hold and then canceled . Due to these risks, ponatinib is now used as a last resort drug . Because of the adverse events associated with ponatinib, there is a motivation to develop other potent BCR‐ABL1(T315I) inhibitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%