2017
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-782961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma

Abstract: Key Points• PVD is an active combination in relapsed lenalidomiderefractory MM patients.• PVD with weekly bortezomib offers a simpler, more convenient, and well-tolerated regimen option. ; and partial response, 36%) and 100% among high-risk patients. Within a median follow-up of 42 months, 20% remain progression free, 66% are alive, and 4% remain on treatment. Median progression-free survival was 13.7 months (95% CI, 9.6-17.7). The most common toxicities were neutropenia (96%), leukopenia (84%), thrombocytopen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Body mass index >25, Age >75, Personal or family history of VTE, Central venous catheter, Acute infection or Hospitalization, Blood clotting disorders or Thrombophilia, Immobility with performance status of >1, Comorbidities (liver, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, diabetes mellitus, chronic inflammatory bowel disease), Race (Caucasian is a risk factor) These guidelines have been available since 2014; however, data from clinical trials demonstrate that the rates of residual VTE remain high [22][23][24]. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that the current risk stratification is suboptimal and fails to fully capture and distinguish between low, intermediate, and high-risk MM patients for VTE.…”
Section: Treatment-related Risk Factors: Assign Points As Seen Belowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body mass index >25, Age >75, Personal or family history of VTE, Central venous catheter, Acute infection or Hospitalization, Blood clotting disorders or Thrombophilia, Immobility with performance status of >1, Comorbidities (liver, renal impairment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, diabetes mellitus, chronic inflammatory bowel disease), Race (Caucasian is a risk factor) These guidelines have been available since 2014; however, data from clinical trials demonstrate that the rates of residual VTE remain high [22][23][24]. Therefore, it is safe to conclude that the current risk stratification is suboptimal and fails to fully capture and distinguish between low, intermediate, and high-risk MM patients for VTE.…”
Section: Treatment-related Risk Factors: Assign Points As Seen Belowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients received thromboprophylaxis with a high dose of aspirin (325 mg), therapeutic dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or warfarin with a target International Normalised Ratio (INR) of 2-3 (of note, none of these thromboprophylaxis strategies would be routinely chosen in current clinical practice) (Lacy et al, 2009). A recent study of pomalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone and bortezomib in 50 patients reported a higher VTE rate of 10%, despite using the high doses of thromboprophylactic agents detailed in the previous study (Paludo et al, 2017). A summary of trial data pertaining to VTE risk associated with the immunomodulatory drugs either alone, with dexamethasone, or with combination chemotherapy, is provided in Table II.…”
Section: Immunomodulatory Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Patients experiencing a lenalidomide-resistant relapse may be treated with triple combination therapy: daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone [348]. Such patients may also respond to pomalidomide-based regimens [349,350].…”
Section: Treatment Of Relapsed Multiple Myeloma-alternatives To Salvagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated above, they probably also have cereblon-independent effects. These differences may explain why myeloma patients developing resistance to one IMiD may not be resistant to the antimyeloma effects of other IMiDs [349,350], and it may also explain the differences in toxicity profiles between different IMiDs [313].…”
Section: Imunnemodulatory Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%