2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2005.12.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyurethane foam (PUF) disks passive air samplers: Wind effect on sampling rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
145
4
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
11
145
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the wind speed effect on the sampling rate in the present study should be taken into account because the wind speed at each height varied greatly and increased sharply from 0.8 m s -1 at 15 to 5.8 m s -1 at 320 m. Figure 2a shows the dependence of the PRC-calibrated sampling rate on wind speed. Uptake rates increased sharply and showed an exponential correlation with wind speed (R 2 ) 0.57, P ) 0.05 in spring; R 2 ) 0.81, P < 0.01 in summer), which is consistent with results from laboratory and wind tunnel experiments (18,19). For instance, Tuduri et al (19) reported that PUF-based sampling rates showed strong wind dependence and increased sharply for indoor air velocities greater than 1.0 m s -1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the wind speed effect on the sampling rate in the present study should be taken into account because the wind speed at each height varied greatly and increased sharply from 0.8 m s -1 at 15 to 5.8 m s -1 at 320 m. Figure 2a shows the dependence of the PRC-calibrated sampling rate on wind speed. Uptake rates increased sharply and showed an exponential correlation with wind speed (R 2 ) 0.57, P ) 0.05 in spring; R 2 ) 0.81, P < 0.01 in summer), which is consistent with results from laboratory and wind tunnel experiments (18,19). For instance, Tuduri et al (19) reported that PUF-based sampling rates showed strong wind dependence and increased sharply for indoor air velocities greater than 1.0 m s -1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Uptake rates increased sharply and showed an exponential correlation with wind speed (R 2 ) 0.57, P ) 0.05 in spring; R 2 ) 0.81, P < 0.01 in summer), which is consistent with results from laboratory and wind tunnel experiments (18,19). For instance, Tuduri et al (19) reported that PUF-based sampling rates showed strong wind dependence and increased sharply for indoor air velocities greater than 1.0 m s -1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have revealed that wind speed can significantly affect the sampling rate, although PUF disk is usually deployed in protective chambers to dampen the effect of wind. Tuduri et al (2006) suggested that the uptake rate increased sharply with the wind speed >3.5 m s À1 . Klanova et al (2008) found that sampling rates increased by a factor of approximately 2 with a wind speed range of 1.5e5.5 m s À1 .…”
Section: Sampling Rates Of Pufmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured air concentrations of PCBs are summarized in Table 1. The uptake rate of passive air sampler has previously been found to mainly be controlled by wind speed (Tuduri et al, 2006). We used the same sampling rate of 14 m À3 day À1 as in our previous study (Li et al, 2009) for calculating the air concentrations of PCBs and PBDEs in the Antarctic air, as similar wind speeds were measured in both studies.…”
Section: Air Concentration and Profile Of Pcbsmentioning
confidence: 99%