2020
DOI: 10.3390/polym12112759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyurethane-Carbon Nanotubes Composite Dual Band Antenna for Wearable Applications

Abstract: The design of a unipole and a dual band F-shaped antenna was conducted to find the best parameters of prepared antenna. Antenna radiator part is fully made of polymer and nonmetal base composite. Thermoplastic polyurethane (PU) was chosen as a matrix and multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) as an electrical conductive filler, which creates conductive network. The use of the composite for the antenna has the advantage in simple preparation through dip coating technique. Minor disadvantage is the usage of solvent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, single-walled CNTs have a long-term effect on the stability of the mechanical properties of the prepared samples. Not exactly the same, Olenick et al [70] designed the antenna with non-metal as the conductive composite material. Monopole and dual-band F-shaped antennas were fabricated on 2 mm thick polypropylene substrates, using thermoplastic PU as a matrix and multi-walled CNTs as conductive fillers, but the antenna performance was poor in harsh environments.…”
Section: Carbon Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, single-walled CNTs have a long-term effect on the stability of the mechanical properties of the prepared samples. Not exactly the same, Olenick et al [70] designed the antenna with non-metal as the conductive composite material. Monopole and dual-band F-shaped antennas were fabricated on 2 mm thick polypropylene substrates, using thermoplastic PU as a matrix and multi-walled CNTs as conductive fillers, but the antenna performance was poor in harsh environments.…”
Section: Carbon Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%