2011
DOI: 10.1177/0013164410393956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polytomous Adaptive Classification Testing

Abstract: Computer-adaptive classification tests focus on classifying respondents in different proficiency groups (e.g., for pass/fail decisions). To date, adaptive classification testing has been dominated by research on dichotomous response formats and classifications in two groups. This article extends this line of research to polytomous classification tests for two-and three-group scenarios (e.g., inferior, mediocre, and superior proficiencies). Results of two simulation experiments with generated and real responses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(64 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Achtyes et al, 2015;Betz & Turner, 2011;Demir & French, 2021;Hol et al, 2007;Simms et al, 2011;Simms & Clark, 2005;Stochl et al, 2016). The results obtained in this study are consistent with those in the literature (Babcock & Weiss, 2012;Choi & Swartz, 2009;Deng et al, 2010;Eroğlu & Kelecioğlu, 2015;Gnambs & Batinic, 2011;He et al, 2014;Kezer, 2013;Linden, 2005;Ping et al, 2006;Sulak & Kelecioglu, 2019;Weiss, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(Achtyes et al, 2015;Betz & Turner, 2011;Demir & French, 2021;Hol et al, 2007;Simms et al, 2011;Simms & Clark, 2005;Stochl et al, 2016). The results obtained in this study are consistent with those in the literature (Babcock & Weiss, 2012;Choi & Swartz, 2009;Deng et al, 2010;Eroğlu & Kelecioğlu, 2015;Gnambs & Batinic, 2011;He et al, 2014;Kezer, 2013;Linden, 2005;Ping et al, 2006;Sulak & Kelecioglu, 2019;Weiss, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, any hopes that a switch from paper to computer would automatically improve psychological measurements (Buchanan, 2000(Buchanan, , 2001 need to be abandoned. However, computerized testing (including unproctored WBT) holds a variety of additional advantages, such as the use of simulation-based assessment scenarios (Schönbrodt & Asendorpf, 2011) or adaptive item presentations (Gnambs & Batinic, 2011;Simms et al, 2011).…”
Section: Implications For Psychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%