2022
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsac032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polysomnographic analysis of maternal sleep position and its relationship to pregnancy complications and sleep-disordered breathing

Abstract: Links between supine “going to sleep” position and stillbirth risk have led to campaigns regarding safe maternal sleep position. This study profiles the distribution of sleep positions overnight and relationships to sleep onset position during pregnancy, and the relationships between supine sleep, sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and pregnancy outcomes. Data from three prospective cohort studies evaluating SDB in healthy and complicated pregnancies was pooled. All participants underwent one night of polysomnog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Louis et al [ 51 ] utilized type III HSAT to test pregnant participants with a high risk of OSA, but all subjects diagnosed with OSA underwent attended PSG ultimately. Wilson et al [ 39 ] and Antony et al [ 49 ] examined participants using type I or type III HSAT, but Antony et al assessed subjects regardless of the device used in the hospital. In contrast, Wilson et al assessed women depending on the methods in a hospital (type I) or home (type III).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Louis et al [ 51 ] utilized type III HSAT to test pregnant participants with a high risk of OSA, but all subjects diagnosed with OSA underwent attended PSG ultimately. Wilson et al [ 39 ] and Antony et al [ 49 ] examined participants using type I or type III HSAT, but Antony et al assessed subjects regardless of the device used in the hospital. In contrast, Wilson et al assessed women depending on the methods in a hospital (type I) or home (type III).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite training our models on less than 10% of our collected dataset, our models achieved an overall mAP@0.50 of 0.76 (0.81 without bed sheets, 0.71 with bed sheets; see Fig 4 ) in the testing phase on unseen images across 24 classes. The tools must account for factors unique to pregnancy anatomy and physiology including, but not limited to, the impact of the pelvis position on uteroplacental hemodynamics and fetal physiology, the location of the low-pressure, thin-walled, and collapsible IVC on the right side of the spine, and the challenge that pregnancy places on the respiratory system, especially during sleep [ 19 , 38 ], and especially when supine [ 19 , 38 , 88 , 89 ]. The models we developed may meet this requirement–we were able to train them to detect sleeping position at a high resolution in that it accounts for the position of the pelvis and the thorax and the direction (right vs. left) at varying degrees (recovery, lateral, tilt) for a total of eleven sleeping postures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research into SDB during pregnancy is needed and further highlighted by Wilson et al in pooled data from three prospective cohorts evaluating SDB during pregnancy, finding the overall respiratory disturbance index significantly increased with higher amounts of sleep in the supine position. 34 Furthermore, supine sleep was related to foetal growth restriction and lower birthweight, noting causality cannot be inferred.…”
Section: Gender and Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%