1998
DOI: 10.1007/s005860050039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polysegmental lumbar posterior wedge osteotomies for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two patients had transient neurological deficits and the overall complication rate is similar to that noted in previous reports [35,37]. One unfortunate patient had catastrophic blood loss during correction of OWO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two patients had transient neurological deficits and the overall complication rate is similar to that noted in previous reports [35,37]. One unfortunate patient had catastrophic blood loss during correction of OWO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Another study also showed that pedicle screw instrumentation in PWO yielded good results [35]. Initial cases in our series were performed using different forms of instrumentation [(5 Hook and rod, 4 Universal Spine Instrumentation Systems-pedicle screw with threaded rods (Ulrich, Ulm, Germany)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Abnormalities of sagittal spinal balance are considered as an abnormal condition [1,[4][5][6][7][8]14]. In spinal sagittal plane deformities, such as flat back syndrome, lumbar kyphosis, or severe thoracic kyphosis, there is a positive sagittal balance with the SVA falling in front of the sacrum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the process in the SPO, elongation of the anterior column in the polysegmental posterior wedge osteotomy is done over multiple segments and without fracturing the anterior column. 58 Van Royen and colleagues 58 reported a mean correction of 9.5°per level (36.3°o verall) in 21 patients who had been treated using this osteotomy combined with instrumentation in the thoracolumbar or lumbar spine. At the last follow-up, however, there was a mean loss of 10.7°.…”
Section: Neurosurg Focus / Volume 24 / January 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%