1962
DOI: 10.1007/bf01816095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyploidy and radiosensitivity in wheat and barley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of chromosome length made during the present work (see tables 2 and 4) agree with those of Bhaskaran and Swaminathan (1960) in so far as the observed values in the hexaploid are significantly lower than the lengths of AABB + DD (P = <0.001). The shorter chromosome lengths observed in the hexaploid cannot, in the light of the results on chromosome volumes, be interpreted as reflecting a diminution of chromosome material.…”
Section: (B) Expectationssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Measurements of chromosome length made during the present work (see tables 2 and 4) agree with those of Bhaskaran and Swaminathan (1960) in so far as the observed values in the hexaploid are significantly lower than the lengths of AABB + DD (P = <0.001). The shorter chromosome lengths observed in the hexaploid cannot, in the light of the results on chromosome volumes, be interpreted as reflecting a diminution of chromosome material.…”
Section: (B) Expectationssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As suggested earlier the compaction is probably the result of increased metaphase coiling and may well serve an adaptive function (Darlington, 1937). A shorter chromosome length in the polyploid wheats has been reported by others Bhaskaran and Swaminathan, 1960). It must be emphasised, however, that the shorter length does not, as has been claimed, reflect a diminution 2.…”
Section: (B) Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mode of action, quality and origin of these anomalies have been studied by a number of workers (Caldecott 1953, Caldecott and Smith 1952, and Bhaskaran and Swaminathan 1960. The type of induced aberrations depend upon whether the chromosomes are effectively monopartite or bipartite at the time of radiation (Caldecott and Smith 1952) .…”
Section: Meiotic Chromosomal Aberrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conger and Johnston (1956) reported radiosensitivity in poly ploids and diploids to be same while Evans and Sparrow (1961) found radiosensitivity of polyploids to be lower than that of diploids. However, Mortimer (1958) and Swaminathan (1964) reported it to be higher while Bhaskaran and Swaminathan (1960) Fujii and Matsumura (1959) Swaminathan and Natranjan (1957) found radiosensitivity to be independent of level of ploidy. In these different reports both auto and allopolyploid material have been used and also different parameters have been taken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%