2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polyphasic bacterial community analysis of an aerobic activated sludge removing phenols and thiocyanate from coke plant effluent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
69
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrolytic fermentative acidogenic activity in anaerobic bioreactors is likely controlled by strict anaerobic bacteria like Longilinea, Clostridium, and Proteiniphilum (Yamada et al 2007;Kohda et al 1997;Letowski et al 2001;Chen and Dong 2005;Larsen et al 2009) and facultative aerobic bacteria such as Corynebacterium (Kampfer et al 2009). In the aerobic sludge, the high abundances of Thiobacillus, Comamonas, Diaphorobacter, Ottowia, and Weeksella (Table S8), which reportedly degrade several phenol and SCN − compounds (Felföldi et al 2010;Beller et al 2006;Klankeo et al 2009;Yuste et al 2000), were in accordance with the significant removal of pollutants in the final effluent. As referred in Table S8, the significant presence of PAHdegrading bacteria like Comamonas (Goyal and Zylstra 1996) and Diaphorobacter (Klankeo et al 2009) indicated the removal of corresponding pollutants in aerobic sludge leading to detoxification of CWW (Zhang et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hydrolytic fermentative acidogenic activity in anaerobic bioreactors is likely controlled by strict anaerobic bacteria like Longilinea, Clostridium, and Proteiniphilum (Yamada et al 2007;Kohda et al 1997;Letowski et al 2001;Chen and Dong 2005;Larsen et al 2009) and facultative aerobic bacteria such as Corynebacterium (Kampfer et al 2009). In the aerobic sludge, the high abundances of Thiobacillus, Comamonas, Diaphorobacter, Ottowia, and Weeksella (Table S8), which reportedly degrade several phenol and SCN − compounds (Felföldi et al 2010;Beller et al 2006;Klankeo et al 2009;Yuste et al 2000), were in accordance with the significant removal of pollutants in the final effluent. As referred in Table S8, the significant presence of PAHdegrading bacteria like Comamonas (Goyal and Zylstra 1996) and Diaphorobacter (Klankeo et al 2009) indicated the removal of corresponding pollutants in aerobic sludge leading to detoxification of CWW (Zhang et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…2, although anaerobic treatment was not effective, the combined system was quite efficient for the removal of SCN − (98.2 %) and CN − (85.4 %) ( Table S1). Degradation of SCN − , CN − , and other nitrogen and sulfur heterocyclic organic compounds was responsible for the release of ammonium and sulfate (Felföldi et al 2010;Staib and Lant 2007;Vazquez et al 2006;Maranon et al 2008;Gai et al 2007). Oxidation of sulfides and thiosulfate (Shoji et al 2014) may have also contributed to the increased concentration of inorganic sulfate in the aerobic effluent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations