2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial versus trigonometric expansions for nonlinear vibrations of circular cylindrical shells with different boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kurylov and Amabili [73] compared the large amplitude response of isotropic shells obtained using Chebyshev polynomials, power polynomials and trigonometric functions for simply supported and clamped boundary conditions. The Sanders Koiter non linear shell theory was used and it was found that trigonometric functions are very efficient for simply supported boundary conditions while they require a large number of degrees of freedom for other boundary conditions, thereby decreasing the computational efficiency.…”
Section: Free and Forced Vibrations Of Shells Due To Radial Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kurylov and Amabili [73] compared the large amplitude response of isotropic shells obtained using Chebyshev polynomials, power polynomials and trigonometric functions for simply supported and clamped boundary conditions. The Sanders Koiter non linear shell theory was used and it was found that trigonometric functions are very efficient for simply supported boundary conditions while they require a large number of degrees of freedom for other boundary conditions, thereby decreasing the computational efficiency.…”
Section: Free and Forced Vibrations Of Shells Due To Radial Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only publications available since 2003 are those by Kurilov and Mikhlin [135] (even if the spelling of both name and surname is different, the first author is the same author of Refs. [73,74] ) and Jansen [136]. Donnell's non linear shallow shell theory was used in both works.…”
Section: Fluid Structure Interaction For Shells Subjected To Flowing mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 8, mode shapes are reported from the finite element analysis for { } ( , ) (1,1), (2,4), (3,3) m n = modes. Overall, the validity of the exact method was approved with comparison to experimental, numerical and theoretical results.…”
Section: Validation Of the Exact Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive summary and discussion of shell theories, including natural frequencies and mode shape identification, has been done by Liessa [1] in 1973. More recently, adopting a non-linear point of view, Amabili and Paidoussis [2], Amabili [3] and Kurylov and Amabili [4] have presented noteworthy reviews on cylindrical shell vibration. Many researchers such as Flugge [5] have followed the pioneering work of Love [6], using his first approximation theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive summary and discussion of shell theories including natural frequencies and mode shape informat ion has been done by Liessa [1] in 1973. More recently, Amabili and Paidoussis [2], A mabili [3] and Kurylov and A mabili [4] have presented noteworthy reviews with a non-linear point of v iew. Many investigations followed the p ioneering work of Love [5] using his first approximation theory, such as Flugge [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%