2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2014.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial-time perfect matchings in dense hypergraphs

Abstract: Abstract. Let H be a k-graph on n vertices, with minimum codegree at least n/k + cn for some fixed c > 0. In this paper we construct a polynomial-time algorithm which finds either a perfect matching in H or a certificate that none exists. This essentially solves a problem of Karpiński, Ruciński and Szymańska; Szymańska previously showed that this problem is NP-hard for a minimum codegree of n/k − cn. Our algorithm relies on a theoretical result of independent interest, in which we characterise any such hypergr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following lemma states that if almost all (k − 1)-tuples of vertices of a k-graph H have high degree, then we can find a k-complex J which covers almost all of the vertices of H, such that J has a useful degree sequence and the 'top level' J = of J is a subgraph of H. The k-partite form of this lemma was given by Keevash, Knox and Mycroft [14,Lemma 7.3] with a straightforward proof. The proof of the form given below is identical except for the simplification of not having to handle multiple vertex classes, so we omit it (this form is also implicit in [16]).…”
Section: 6mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following lemma states that if almost all (k − 1)-tuples of vertices of a k-graph H have high degree, then we can find a k-complex J which covers almost all of the vertices of H, such that J has a useful degree sequence and the 'top level' J = of J is a subgraph of H. The k-partite form of this lemma was given by Keevash, Knox and Mycroft [14,Lemma 7.3] with a straightforward proof. The proof of the form given below is identical except for the simplification of not having to handle multiple vertex classes, so we omit it (this form is also implicit in [16]).…”
Section: 6mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in recent years there has been much study of the case of a perfect matching, see e.g. [1,2,6,11,14,16,17,18,23,26,28,29,35,36]. For perfect Hpackings other than a perfect matching, results are much more sparse.…”
Section: Perfect Packings In Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then G contains a perfect K r -packing. Keevash and Knox [14] also have announced a proof of Theorem 1.3 in the case when r = 3. Conjecture 1.2 considers a 'Pósa-type' degree sequence condition: Pósa's theorem [25] states that a graph G on n ≥ 3 vertices has a Hamilton cycle if its degree sequence d 1 ≤ • • • ≤ d n satisfies d i ≥ i+1 for all i < (n−1)/2 and if additionally d ⌈n/2⌉ ≥ ⌈n/2⌉ when n is odd.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%