Proceedings of the Third ACM Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation - SYMSAC '76 1976
DOI: 10.1145/800205.806346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial real root isolation using Descarte's rule of signs

Abstract: Uspensky's 1948 book on the theory of equations presents an algorithm, based on Descartes' rule of signs, for isolating the real roots of a squarefree polynomial with real coefficients. Programmed in SAC-I and applied to several classes of polynomials with integer coefficients, Uspensky's method proves to be a strong competitor of the recently discovered algorithm of Collins and Loos. It is shown, however, that it's maximum computing time is exponential in the coefficient length. This motivates a modification … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
130
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Davenport (1985) proved that the subdivision tree for the Sturm method is O(d (L + ln d)), see Reischert (1997), Lickteig and Roy (2001), Du et al (2007), Emiris et al (2008) and Johnson (1991). More recently, it has been shown in Eigenwillig et al (2006) and Emiris et al (2008) that the Descartes method also achieves this bound, see Collins and Akritas (1976), Eigenwillig et al (2006), Krandick and Mehlhorn (2006), Collins et al (2002), Sagraloff (2011) andJohnson (1991). These methods are optimal under the weak assumption that L ≥ ln d. In addition, related exact techniques using continued fractions were shown to have a tree size of  O(dL) when an ideal root bound is used and  O(d 2 L) when a more practical bound is used (Sharma, 2008); in the expected case, the tree was also shown in Tsigaridas and Emiris (2008) to have an expected size of O(d 2…”
Section: Other Root Isolation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davenport (1985) proved that the subdivision tree for the Sturm method is O(d (L + ln d)), see Reischert (1997), Lickteig and Roy (2001), Du et al (2007), Emiris et al (2008) and Johnson (1991). More recently, it has been shown in Eigenwillig et al (2006) and Emiris et al (2008) that the Descartes method also achieves this bound, see Collins and Akritas (1976), Eigenwillig et al (2006), Krandick and Mehlhorn (2006), Collins et al (2002), Sagraloff (2011) andJohnson (1991). These methods are optimal under the weak assumption that L ≥ ln d. In addition, related exact techniques using continued fractions were shown to have a tree size of  O(dL) when an ideal root bound is used and  O(d 2 L) when a more practical bound is used (Sharma, 2008); in the expected case, the tree was also shown in Tsigaridas and Emiris (2008) to have an expected size of O(d 2…”
Section: Other Root Isolation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there is an extension to the case of analytic functions [17,38]. For the problem of isolating the roots of polynomials we refer the reader to [23,20,19,12,36,24,7,27,9] and the references therein. There are also approaches [24] that achieve locally quadratic convergence towards the simple roots of polynomial systems and there very efficient in practice.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the Descartes Method [7,27] to find isolating intervals for all real roots of a polynomial. We have a choice of different implementations, of which Interval Descartes [9] and Sturm sequences are ongoing work.…”
Section: Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%