“…Davenport (1985) proved that the subdivision tree for the Sturm method is O(d (L + ln d)), see Reischert (1997), Lickteig and Roy (2001), Du et al (2007), Emiris et al (2008) and Johnson (1991). More recently, it has been shown in Eigenwillig et al (2006) and Emiris et al (2008) that the Descartes method also achieves this bound, see Collins and Akritas (1976), Eigenwillig et al (2006), Krandick and Mehlhorn (2006), Collins et al (2002), Sagraloff (2011) andJohnson (1991). These methods are optimal under the weak assumption that L ≥ ln d. In addition, related exact techniques using continued fractions were shown to have a tree size of O(dL) when an ideal root bound is used and O(d 2 L) when a more practical bound is used (Sharma, 2008); in the expected case, the tree was also shown in Tsigaridas and Emiris (2008) to have an expected size of O(d 2…”