2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-020-00973-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial inequalities on the Hamming cube

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where T d (t) is the d-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind, that is, the unique real polynomial of degree d such that cos(dθ) = T d (cos θ) for every θ ∈ R. Moreover, Iyer, Rao, Reis, Rothvoss and Yehudayoff observed in [11,Proposition 2] that this estimate is asymptotically sharp. We present a simple proof of their inequality (22) (see also [10] for related arguments).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…where T d (t) is the d-th Chebyshev polynomial of the first kind, that is, the unique real polynomial of degree d such that cos(dθ) = T d (cos θ) for every θ ∈ R. Moreover, Iyer, Rao, Reis, Rothvoss and Yehudayoff observed in [11,Proposition 2] that this estimate is asymptotically sharp. We present a simple proof of their inequality (22) (see also [10] for related arguments).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Throughout this paper and [16], we have been studying learning algorithms for F n,d and B n,d equipped with the Hilbertian L 2 -metric. This choice allows us to use Parseval's identity and thus exploit properties of individual Walsh coefficients to study the distance between f and the hypothesis function h. However as the constructed hypothesis functions h are always of degree at most d themselves, this can be generalized to any L p norm, where 0 < p < ∞, since these are equivalent to the L 2 norm on the space of degree-d polynomials up to constants depending only on d (see [36, §9.5] and [7,6,15] for more on moment comparison of polynomials).…”
Section: Exact Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof of Theorem 9. The proof of Theorem 9 relies on the following result of Mendel and Naor from [MN14] (see also [EI20] for a different proof and further results in this direction).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%