2018
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2018.2834526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial Chaos-Based Approach to Yield-Driven EM Optimization

Abstract: Yield-driven optimization is important in microwave design due to the uncertainties introduced in the manufacturing process. For the first time, we extend in this paper the use of polynomial chaos (PC) approach from electromagnetic (EM)-based yield estimation to EM-based yield optimization of microwave structures. We first formulate a novel objective function for yield-driven EM optimization. By incorporating the PC coefficients into the formulation, the objective function is analytically related to yield opti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most critical SBO component is the surrogate model, i.e., an auxiliary model which has to be significantly faster to evaluate than the original (high-fidelity) system representation. Practically utilized surrogates can be divided into two major groups: physicsbased, constructed by appropriate correction of the underlying low-fidelity models (e.g., equivalent networks [19]) and data-driven (also referred to as approximation ones, e.g., kriging [24], neural networks [25], polynomial chaos expansion [26]). Computational efficiency of SBO procedures is a combination of two factors: (i) shifting majority of operations into the surrogate model, and (ii) sparse evaluation of the high-fidelity model (executed for design verification and surrogate model enhancement).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most critical SBO component is the surrogate model, i.e., an auxiliary model which has to be significantly faster to evaluate than the original (high-fidelity) system representation. Practically utilized surrogates can be divided into two major groups: physicsbased, constructed by appropriate correction of the underlying low-fidelity models (e.g., equivalent networks [19]) and data-driven (also referred to as approximation ones, e.g., kriging [24], neural networks [25], polynomial chaos expansion [26]). Computational efficiency of SBO procedures is a combination of two factors: (i) shifting majority of operations into the surrogate model, and (ii) sparse evaluation of the high-fidelity model (executed for design verification and surrogate model enhancement).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary objective of neural network training is to minimize E(w) by adjusting the weighting parameters w. The benefit of the neural network model is more significant when the model is used in design process such as design optimization, Monte Carlo analysis and yield optimization [84]. The more we use the model, the more benefits we have.…”
Section: Neural Network Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the suggestion in [25], we set p = q = 1 and the weighting factor α m = 1 in this thesis. These settings lead to an objective function in the following form [50]:…”
Section: Formulation Of the Original Em-based Yield Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 4) Numerically evaluate the PC coefficients a ij using numerical quadrature based on the sparse grid technique [50].…”
Section: Incorporating the Pce Approach For Yield Verification On Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation