2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.010402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polynomial Bell Inequalities

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
172
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
172
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows us to violate the bilocal causality inequality proposed in ref. 19 and further developed in refs 20, 22, 23, 24, 25:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This allows us to violate the bilocal causality inequality proposed in ref. 19 and further developed in refs 20, 22, 23, 24, 25:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c), which introduce additional structure to the set of classically allowed correlations. In fact, there are quantum correlations that can emerge in networks that, while admitting a LHV description, are incompatible with any classical description where the independence of the sources is considered19202122232425. For instance, a network with two independent sources allow for the emergence of a different kind of non-local correlations violating the so-called bilocal causality assumption1920.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This triggered further research, with the derivation of novel non-linear inequalities and the exploration of more sophisticated networks; see e.g. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. However, the extent of quantum correlations in networks remains poorly understood.…”
Section: Arxiv:170200333v1 [Quant-ph] 1 Feb 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been much interest in deriving bounds on the correlations achievable in classical causal models [76,77,79,80] using insights from the literature on Bell's theorem. Such bounds constitute Bell-like inequalities for arbitrary causal structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%