“…A survey of reported activation energies for solid–solid phase transitions and sublimation enthalpies of the compounds involved in the processes shows that E a values considerably higher than Δ sub H m ° are not uncommon. Thus, in the case of 1,1-diamino-2,2-dinitroethylene (FOX-7), while the estimated enthalpies of sublimation for an unspecified polymorph lie in the range Δ sub H m ° = 109–116 kJ·mol –1 , , the experimentally obtained activation energies of the β → γ and γ → δ transitions are E a (β → γ) = 215 kJ mol –1 and E a (γ → δ) = 647 kJ mol –1 , respectively; for 2,4,5,6-tetrachlorobenzene-1,3-dicarbonitrile (chlorothalonil), Δ sub H m ° = 107 kJ·mol –1 and E a (α → β) = 650 kJ mol –1 ; for 2-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)aminobenzoic acid (form I), Δ sub H m °(cr I) = 133 kJ·mol –1 and E a (I → II) = 300–362 kJ mol –1 ; − and in the case of the widely studied octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX) system, Δ sub H m ° = 162 kJ·mol –1 and E a (β → δ) = 204–510 kJ·mol –1 . − The significance of these large activation energies (larger than the sublimation enthalpies) is impossible to assess without detailed information about the phase transition mechanism, which in the above examples, as in the case of HAP, is essentially unknown. The HAP results suggest, nevertheless, a complex nucleation and growth process consisting of several elementary steps characterized by their own individual E a that add up to a large overall value (also dubbed apparent activation energy).…”