2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphisms and microvariant sequences in the Japanese population for 25 Y-STR markers and their relationships to Y-chromosome haplogroups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study undertook molecular linkage analysis of major surnames among Japanese men with Y chromosomal polymorphisms. The Y-STR network of samples was consistent with recent observations of the Japanese population, in which Y-SNP haplogroups were biased on the divergent distribution of Y-STR haplotypes, as reported by Watahiki et al [27]. The combination of Y-STR haplotype with Y-SNP haplogroup provided a high-resolution network structure of the phylogeny of bearers [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This study undertook molecular linkage analysis of major surnames among Japanese men with Y chromosomal polymorphisms. The Y-STR network of samples was consistent with recent observations of the Japanese population, in which Y-SNP haplogroups were biased on the divergent distribution of Y-STR haplotypes, as reported by Watahiki et al [27]. The combination of Y-STR haplotype with Y-SNP haplogroup provided a high-resolution network structure of the phylogeny of bearers [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Duplications at DYF387S1 produced two instances of triallelic patterns similar to those reported in several populations (Ye et al 2015;Pickrahn et al 2016;Wang et al 2016;Iacovacci et al 2017;Spólnicka et al 2017;Watahiki et al 2019). In one predicted haplogroup J1a male the alleles 36, 37 and 38 were all detected with equal strength implying an equal copy number, as would be seen if just one DYF387S1 copy had been duplicated.…”
Section: Y-str Allele and Haplotype Diversitysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A neighbor‐joining (NJ) phylogenetic tree was constructed on the basis of the Rst genetic matrixes using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0 (MEGA 6.0) (Tamura et al, 2013). The 67 reference groups included 22 Chinese populations (Fan et al, 2019; Gayden et al, 2012; Hu et al, 2017; Ji et al, 2017; Kim et al, 2001; Liu et al, 2019; Luo et al, 2019; Song et al, 2020; Sun et al, 2019; Tang et al, 2020; Xie et al, 2019; Yang et al, 2014; Yin et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2017; Zhou et al, 2016) and 45 worldwide populations (Aliferi et al, 2018; D'Atanasio et al, 2019; Füredi et al, 1999; García et al, 2016; Hallenberg et al, 2005; Henry et al, 2019; Jankauskiene et al, 2017; Jankova et al, 2019; Pickrahn et al, 2016; Purps et al, 2014; Rapone et al, 2016; Shonhai et al, 2020; Spólnicka et al, 2017; Watahiki et al, 2019; Zgonjanin et al, 2017; Zhabagin et al, 2019) and the information about these groups are listed in Table .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%