“…Thus, the limited neonatal response to gB 498–505 , the immunodominant CTL determinant to HSV, could have been associated with an enhanced response to subdominant determinants. Here, we show that this was not the case, as the neonatal CTL response to the subdominant epitope to HSV‐2, RR1 829–836 35, 36, was similarly reduced. Numerous studies have defined the memory CD8 + T cell response to viruses in the newborn 10–16, 18, including a disabled infectious single‐cycle HSV‐1 strain 42, but few studies 10, 15, 26, 27, like ours, have examined the kinetics of the primary CTL response in the neonatal period after viral infection.…”