2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1022795411030173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polymorphism of SSR alleles in pear cultivars grown in Belarus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the average number of alleles (17) among the analysed genotypes was increased in this study compared with that observed in earlier studies performed in several collections of P . communis using different sets of SSRs (ranging from 5.9 to 12.8) [ 21 , 25 , 54 , 56 57 , 61 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the average number of alleles (17) among the analysed genotypes was increased in this study compared with that observed in earlier studies performed in several collections of P . communis using different sets of SSRs (ranging from 5.9 to 12.8) [ 21 , 25 , 54 , 56 57 , 61 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Fuji' showed a high level of admixture and had large differences from other members of their species. It is reported that the pedigree of 'Duchesse' pear is not clear [49]. In addition, the pattern of phylogenetic distribution of different genera in this investigation based on RAPD markers clearly revealed the differences between the studied genera ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Population Genetic Structurementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Screenings based on the SSR have been performed for various large collections of European pear (Ahmed et al 2010, Bassil and Postman 2009, Bassil et al 2008, Brini et al 2008, Fernández-Fernández 2010, Miranda et al 2010, Sisko et al 2009, Urbanovich et al 2011, Wünsch and Hormaza 2007, Xuan 2008, Yakovin et al 2011). However, most of the studies showed a large number of mislabelling even in well-characterized fruit tree collections (Schouten et al 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%